This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Robert J. Simon, MA; Barry J. Gurland, MRCP, DPM; Joseph L. Fleiss, PhD; Lawrence Sharpe, MB, DPM

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1971;24(5):437-440.

Abstract
This communication examines the effect of a lengthy patient history interview in modifying a diagnosis made after a thorough examination of the patient's present mental state. The diagnoses given to 396 patients after a mental state examination were compared with those given after a subsequent patient history interview. Changes across major diagnostic categories occurred for only 15% of the sample; most of these changes occurred when there was uncertainty present in the mental state diagnosis. There was little change in the degree of confidence with which the mental state and patient history diagnoses were expressed, and little change in the number of subsidiary diagnoses given. The diagnostic distribution of the entire sample after the patient history interview was remarkably similar to that after the mental state examination.

Author Affiliations
New York

From the New York State Department of Mental Hygiene, New York.

Footnotes
Accepted for publication Sept 14, 1970.

Reprint requests to Biometrics Research, 722 W 168th St, New York 10032 (Mr. Simon).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Quantification of Agreement in Multiple Psychiatric Diagnosis
Fleiss et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1972;26:168-171.
ABSTRACT