You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 25 No. 2, August 1971 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (26)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Treatment and Training Outcomes With Two Time-Limited Therapies

Virginia Patterson, MA; Howard Levene, MD; Louis Breger, PhD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1971;25(2):161-167.


Abstract

The project undertook to teach two forms of brief therapy (Psychoanalytic and behavioral to mental health trainees and to compare treatment outcome as judged by the patients, their therapists, and experienced clinicians working from case records. A group of eight trainees were divided between the two teaching programs with a crossover at midyear that permitted training and treatment effects to be evaluated in counterbalanced design. Results indicated that patients rated themselves more improved immediately following brief behavior therapy than following brief psychotherapy. The finding is discussed with reference to the learning task for therapists and patient expectations. Therapist preferences for the two treatment orientations were studied in relation to therapist personality characteristics. Behavior therapy evoked a more distinct cluster of attitudes and personality dispositions than did psychotherapy.



Author Affiliations

San Francisco

From the Langley Porter Neuropsychiatric Institute, the California Department of Mental Hygiene, and the Department of Psychiatry, University of California School of Medicine.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Oct 9, 1970.

The opinions or conclusions stated in this paper are those of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as necessarily representing the policy of the Langley Porter Institute or the California Department of Mental Hygiene.

Reprint requests to Langley Porter Neuropsychiatric Institute, 401 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco 94122 (V. Patterson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Self-Regulatory Model of Adjunctive Behavior Change
Schefft and Lehr
Behav Modif 1985;9:458-476.
ABSTRACT  

The Relationship in Counseling and Psychotherapy: Components, Consequences, and Theoretical Antecedents
Gelso and Carter
The Counseling Psychologist 1985;13:155-243.
ABSTRACT  

Does Psychotherapy Benefit Neurotic Patients? A Reanalysis of the Smith, Glass, and Miller Data
Andrews and Harvey
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1981;38:1203-1208.
ABSTRACT  

The Effectiveness of Time Limits in Counseling and Psychotherapy: A Critical Review
Johnson and Gelso
The Counseling Psychologist 1981;9:70-83.
 

Comparative Studies of Psychotherapies: Is It True That "Everyone Has Won and All Must Have Prizes"?
Luborsky et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1975;32:995-1008.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1971 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.