You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 25 No. 3, September 1971 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (26)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Ambiguity for Individuation

A Critique and Reformation of Double-Bind Theory

John S. Kafka, MD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1971;25(3):232-239.


Abstract

Clinical observations suggest a link between dissociative experiences in adult patients and underexposure to ambiguous communications during certain developmental phases. Formal characteristics of ambiguous and paradoxical communications are examined in detail. A theory is proposed which connects parental fear and intolerance of ambiguity with the offspring's inability to integrate paradoxical aspects of reality. This theory is contrasted with the double-bind theory which states that an abundance of certain paradoxical communications is schizophrenogenic. The "therapeutic doublebind" is seen as a "replacement" of essential paradoxical communications which were scarce and inadequate rather than overabundant during crucial developmental phases.



Author Affiliations

Washington, DC

From the Family Development Section, Child Research Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, the Department of Psychiatry, George Washington University School of Medicine, and the Washington Psychoanalytic Institute, Washington, DC.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Sept 28, 1970.

Presented in part at Chestnut Lodge in 1963 and 1965, at the National Institute of Mental Health in 1966 and 1969, and at the Double-Bind Symposium of the 77th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, September 1969.

Reprint requests to Family Development Section, Child Research Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Md 20014.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Goals of Psychoanalysis and Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy
McGlashan and Miller
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1982;39:377-388.
ABSTRACT  

Borderline Personality Disorders: The Concept, The Syndrome, The Patient.
Kafka,
J Am Psychoanal Assoc 1981;29:236-247.
 

Transitional Fantasiesin the Analysis of a Narcissistic Personality
Volkan
J Am Psychoanal Assoc 1973;21:351-376.
 

Notes Marriages in the Counter Culture
Kafka and Ryder
Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 1973;9:321-330.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1971 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.