 |
|
Behavioral Measurement of Severe Depression
James G. Williams, MD;
David H. Barlow, PhD;
W. Stewart Agras, MD
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1972;27(3):330-333.
Abstract
Three different methods of measuring depression were studied in ten severely depressed patients. Serial assessments were made using the Beck Depressive Inventory (self-rating scale), the Hamilton Rating Scale (physician-rated scale), and objective behavioral measures. The hypothesis was that these three methods would show a significant correlation; the study confirms this. The behavioral measures are an inexpensive method of assessing the depth of depression and seem to predict the posttreatment adaptation better than the Beck Depressive Inventory or the Hamilton Rating Scale. Behavioral measures should be useful in future research to assess the results of drug or somatic therapies.
Author Affiliations
Jackson, Miss
From the Department of Psychiatry, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson.
Footnotes
Accepted for publication Feb 15, 1972.
Reprint requests to 2500 N State St, Jackson, Miss 39216 (Dr. Williams).
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Clinical Outcomes Following a Trial of Sertraline in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Slaughter et al.
Psychosomatics 2002;43:36-41.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Reflection-Enhancing Regulative Communication: How Do Parents Vary Across Misbehavior Situations and Child Resistance?
Wilson et al.
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 1996;13:553-569.
ABSTRACT
Gender Differences in the Costs and Benefits of Peer Relationships During Adolescence
Moran and Eckenrode
Journal of Adolescent Research 1991;6:396-409.
ABSTRACT
Adolescents and Maternal Employment: Is it Harmful for a Young Adolescent to Have an Employed Mother?
Armistead et al.
The Journal of Early Adolescence 1990;10:260-278.
ABSTRACT
Psychologist Versus Client Perspectives in the Assessment of Psychopathology
Bolton
Applied Psychological Measurement 1977;1:533-542.
ABSTRACT
Depression Rating Scales: A Critical Review
Carroll et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1973;28:361-366.
ABSTRACT
|
