You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 27 No. 4, October 1972 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Some Features of the Auditory Evoked Response in Schizophrenics

Walton T. Roth, MD; Eleanor H. Cannon, MA

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1972;27(4):466-471.


Abstract

Twenty-one schizophrenics and 21 controls were exposed to a tenminute sequence of frequent and infrequent auditory stimuli. The amplitude of the third positive-going component (p3) of the average evoked response to infrequent stimuli was much larger in the control group (P<.0003). Using a P3 amplitude of 3.20µv in the first 2.5 minutes as a dividing point, only seven of the 42 subjects were misclassified. This amplitude had a significant correlation of -.48 with patient's age at first hospitalization. Amplitude of the second positive-going component (P2) to frequent stimuli was also much larger in the control group (P<.003). This amplitude has a significant correlation of -.41 with medication dosage in terms of equivalent amounts of chlorpromazine. Behavioral scales failed to correlate significantly with evoked response measures. Evoked response latencies did not distinguish the two groups.



Author Affiliations

Washington, DC

From the Laboratory of Clinical Psychopharmacology, Division of Special Mental Health Research IRP, MH, Washington, DC. Dr. Roth is now at the Department of Psychiatry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication April 6, 1971.

Reprint requests to Department of Psychiatry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif 94305 (Dr. Roth).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Application of Electroencephalography to the Study of Cognitive and Brain Functions in Schizophrenia
van der Stelt and Belger
Schizophr Bull 2007;33:955-970.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Neurophysiological Endophenotypes of Schizophrenia: The Viability of Selected Candidate Measures
Turetsky et al.
Schizophr Bull 2007;33:69-94.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

No effects of l-dopa and bromocriptine on psychophysiological parameters of human selective attention
Oranje et al.
J Psychopharmacol 2006;20:789-798.
ABSTRACT  

Impaired P3 Generation Reflects High-Level and Progressive Neurocognitive Dysfunction in Schizophrenia
van der Stelt et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2004;61:237-248.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

P300 and Genetic Risk for Schizophrenia
Winterer et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003;60:1158-1167.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

First-Episode Schizophrenic Psychosis Differs From First-Episode Affective Psychosis and Controls in P300 Amplitude Over Left Temporal Lobe
Salisbury et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1998;55:173-180.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Schizophrenia: a neurophysiological evaluation of abnormal information processing
Baribeau-Braun et al.
Science 1983;219:874-876.
ABSTRACT  

Schizophrenia and Stimulus Intensity Control
Landau et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1975;32:1239-1245.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1972 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.