Toward a More Efficient Mental Status ExaminationFree-Form or Operationally Defined
William D. Weitzel, MD;
Donald W. Morgan, MD;
Thomas E. Guyden, MD;
James A. Robinson
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1973;28(2):215-218.
Abstract
This study compares free-form and operationally defined admission mental status examinations completed independently in 49 unselected cases. Both types of mental status examinations were diagnostically oriented and appropriate to evaluation and treatment in an acutely ill inpatient psychiatric service. The consensus opinions of 28 full professors of departments of psychiatry from medical schools located throughout the country provided the standard for comparison.
Results demonstrate that there is a set of characteristics that current recognized experts in psychiatry agree upon as belonging in a mental status examination. The operationally defined mental status is shown to be more efficient than free-form recording since the former captures standard information more systematically without any additional effort on the part of the physician.
Author Affiliations
DMSc; Washington, DC
From Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Footnotes
Accepted for publication Oct 11, 1972.
Reprint requests to Research Office, Department of Psychiatry and Neurology, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20012 (Dr. Morgan).
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
The Patient-Computer Interview: A Neglected Tool That Can Aid the Clinician
Bachman
Mayo Clin Proc. 2003;78:67-78.
ABSTRACT
Establishing the Limits of the Mini-Mental State: Examination of 'Subtests'
Feher et al.
Arch Neurol 1992;49:87-92.
ABSTRACT
Concurrent Diagnostic Validity of a Structured Psychiatric Interview
Helzer et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1978;35:849-853.
ABSTRACT
Reliability of Psychiatric Diagnosis: I. A Methodological Review
Helzer et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1977;34:129-133.
ABSTRACT
|
