You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 30 No. 3, March 1974 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Shame and Guilt in Family Relations

Theoretical and Clinical Aspects

Helm Stierlin, MD, PHD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1974;30(3):381-389.


Abstract

Shame and guilt denote painful and complex experiences. These interweave with, yet also differ from, each other. The three psychoanalytic constructs of ego-ideal, conscience, and self-observation—all forming part of the superego—illuminate their differing dynamics. Often shame and guilt recur sequentially in shame-guilt or guiltshame cycles.

This report describes shame-guilt cycles, also called shame-guilt binds, in families. It distinguishes between marital (vertical) and intergenerational (horizontal) shame-guilt cycles or binds. In each case, complex homeostatic processes come into play. Pseudomutual and pseudohostile families, as described by Wynne et al, reveal typical variations of these processes. To an extent, such homeostatic features of shame and guilt serve positive functions, but easily become restrictive, and then interfere with each member's individuation and separation. When this happens, they must become a focus for interpretative psychotherapeutic intervention.

The family therapist must work toward the voluntary acceptance, rather than the forced admission, of shame and guilt. Also, he must be able to deal with family myths and must see the above binds in a multigenerational perspective.



Author Affiliations

Bethesda, Md

From the Family Studies Section, Adult Psychiatry Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Oct 29, 1973.

Reprint requests to the Family Studies Section, Adult Psychiatry Branch, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20014 (Dr. Stierlin).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Korean Culture and Sense of Shame
Lee
Transcultural Psychiatry 1999;36:181-194.
ABSTRACT  

Relationship of Cognitive Appraisals and Attachment to Emotional Events within the Family of Origin
McCarthy et al.
The Family Journal 1996;4:316-326.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1974 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.