You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 31 No. 3, September 1974 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Treatment Acceptance Following Intake Assignment to Individual Therapy, Group Therapy, or Contact Group

William A. Hargreaves, PhD; Jonathan Showstack; Rinna Flohr, MSW; Clair Brady, MSW; Sanford Harris, MA

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1974;31(3):343-349.


Abstract

Factors relevant to the choice of individual therapy vs two types of group treatment were studied. Applicants were randomly assigned to individual therapy, to ongoing weekly therapy groups, or to a daily nonappointment contact group. The immediate acceptance of this referral was judged by whether the applicant kept his first treatment appointment and, if he did, by client and therapist ratings following this first appointment.

Results suggest that the initial acceptance of treatment could be improved by not initially assigning poorly motivated applicants to group therapy. But more surprising was the finding that shy and distressed clients best accepted the daily nonappointment contact groups while the more articulate and outgoing client responded best to the more traditional ongoing weekly group.

Clients assigned to the "wrong" type of group therapy showed poor acceptance of the referral, while the "correctly" referred group showed initial acceptance as great as comparable clients assigned to individual therapy.



Author Affiliations

From the Langley Porter Neuropsychiatric Institute, University of California, San Francisco (Dr. Hargreaves and J. Showstack), and the Center for Special Problems, San Francisco Community Mental Health Services (R. Flohr, C. Brady, and S. Harris).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Jan 16, 1974.

Reprint requests to the Langley Porter Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143 (Dr. Hargreaves).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Client Satisfaction With Mental Health Treatment: Methodological Considerations in Assessment
Lebow
Eval Rev 1983;7:729-752.
ABSTRACT  

Influence of Therapy On Client Outcomes:: An Options Analysis of Three Modalities
Weyant et al.
Eval Health Prof 1981;4:347-364.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1974 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.