You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 32 No. 10, October 1975 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Concordance of Multiple Assessments of the Outcome of Schizophrenia

On Defining the Dependent Variable in Outcome Studies

Carol C. Schwartz, PhD; Jerome K. Myers, PhD; Boris M. Astrachan, MD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1975;32(10):1221-1227.


Abstract

• Concordance of multiple assessments of the outcome of schizophrenia are examined from (1) concordance of three different assessments of mental status, and (2) concordance of four different dimensions of outcome. Findings are related to the methodological issue of defining the dependent variable in outcome studies.

When the assessment instruments were compared, discordance in overall assessment happened because each instrument taps varying aspects of symptomatology, suggesting that outcome is somewhat instrument-related. Although adjustment in mental status is correlated with social adjustment and role performance, a patient's status at follow-up bears little relationship to rate of rehospitalization or to consumer satisfaction with treatment. A differential impact of the same predictor variables on four dimensions of outcome underscores the discordance in multiple assessments. Since treatment outcome is multifaceted and multidetermined, multiple assessments must continue as vital procedures.



Author Affiliations

From the departments of psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York (Dr. Schwartz); and Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (Dr. Astrachan); and the Department of Sociology, Yale University (Dr. Myers).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Nov 7, 1974.

Reprint requests to the Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (Dr. Schwartz).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Prediction of Outcome in Chronic Schizophrenia: IV. The Chestnut Lodge Follow-up Study
McGlashan
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1986;43:167-176.
ABSTRACT  

Measures of Social Functioning in Psychiatric Outcome Research
Beattie and Stevenson
Eval Rev 1984;8:631-644.
ABSTRACT  

The Chestnut Lodge Follow-up Study: I. Follow-up Methodology and Study Sample
McGlashan
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1984;41:573-585.
ABSTRACT  

The Psychosocial Functioning Inventory
Feragne et al.
Eval Health Prof 1983;6:25-48.
ABSTRACT  

Prognosis in Schizophrenia: Prognostic Predictors and Outcome
Bland and Parker
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1978;35:72-77.
ABSTRACT  

Ward Treatment Milieu and Posthospital Functioning
Klass et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1977;34:1047-1052.
ABSTRACT  

The Long-Term Patient in the Era of Community Treatment
Lamb and Goertzel
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1977;34:679-682.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1975 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.