This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (56)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Joseph Westermeyer, MD, PhD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1976;33(9):1135-1139.

Abstract
• Over 25 years anti-opium laws were enacted by three Asian governments in countries where opium use was traditional. Within months, heroin use suddenly appeared; and within a decade, heroin addiction surpassed opium addiction. The laws led to (1) increased price of narcotic drugs, (2) a heroin "industry," (3) corruption of the law enforcement system, and (4) major health problems involving parenteral drug use.

The Asian experience indicates that antinarcotic laws can be effective only with careful preparations: (1) changing society's attitude toward the traditional drug from ambivalence to opposition; (2) mobilizing resources to treat and rehabilitate all addicts within a short period of time; (3) developing the social will to incarcerate all "recidivist" addicts for a prolonged period; and (4) preventing narcotic production or importation.

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

Footnotes
Accepted for publication March 17, 1975.

Reprint requests to Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (Dr Westermeyer).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Substance use: time for drug law reform
CMAJ 2000;162:1693-1694.
 

Prohibition of Traditional Addicting Drugs: Social Repercussions
Hussey
JAMA 1976;236:1501-1501.
ABSTRACT