You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 34 No. 10, October 1977 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Choosing an Approach for Diagnosing Schizophrenia

John S. Strauss, MD; Thomas E. Gift, MD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1977;34(10):1248-1253.


Abstract

• In recent years, many competing concepts of schizophrenia have been described, each with some evidence to support its value. Even more recently, specific evaluation methods and diagnostic criteria have been developed so that each of these concepts can be reliably diagnosed. Because of these advances, it is important for the clinician and investigator working with schizophrenics to recognize the way in which the various concepts are reflected in the several reliable approaches now available for diagnosis and to be able to choose a method of diagnosis that is most likely to be useful. We describe the competing conceptualizations and the related diagnostic approaches that have been developed, and then outline the differences and similarities and advantages and disadvantages of these approaches. An orientation toward using these approaches for diagnosing schizophrenia is suggested that permits employing several approaches simultaneously to provide the greatest chance for determining important relationships among diagnostic, clinical, and research variables.



Author Affiliations

Adapted from a report originally prepared for the Diagnostic Conference of the Investigators Studying Children at Risk for Schizophrenia, Rochester, NY, Oct 31, 1974.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication May 6, 1977.

Reprint requests to Yale Psychiatric Institute, Box 12A, Yale Station, New Haven, Conn 06520 (Dr Strauss).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Competing Definitions of Schizophrenia: What Can Be Learned From Polydiagnostic Studies?
Jansson and Parnas
Schizophr Bull 2007;33:1178-1200.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

How Non-Diagnostic Listening Led to a Rapid "Recovery" from Paranoid Schizophrenia: What is Wrong with Psychiatry?
Siebert
Journal of Humanistic Psychology 2000;40:34-58.
ABSTRACT  

The Chestnut Lodge Follow-up Study: I. Follow-up Methodology and Study Sample
McGlashan
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1984;41:573-585.
ABSTRACT  

Testing Four Diagnostic Systems for Schizophrenia
McGlashan
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1984;41:141-144.
ABSTRACT  

The Choice of Diagnostic Criteria for Biological Research
Kendell
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1982;39:1334-1339.
ABSTRACT  

Schneiderian First-Rank Symptoms in Schizophrenia
Silverstein and Harrow
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1981;38:288-293.
ABSTRACT  

Schizoaffective Disorder and Drug-Free Improvement-Reply
Marder et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1981;38:232-233.
ABSTRACT  

Psychiatry
Freedman
JAMA 1978;239:510-512.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1977 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.