You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 34 No. 2, February 1977 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Reliability of Psychiatric Diagnosis

II. The Test/Retest Reliability of Diagnostic Classification

John E. Helzer, MD; Paula J. Clayton, MD; Robert Pambakian, MD; Theodore Reich, MD; Robert A Woodruff, Jr, MD; Michael A. Reveley, MD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1977;34(2):136-141.


Abstract

• In a study of interrater diagnostic reliability, 101 psychiatric inpatients were independently interviewed by physicians using a structured interview. Newly admitted patients were randomly selected and examined by one of three psychiatrists. A second psychiatrist reexamined the same patient about 24 hours later. Interviews from the two examinations were evaluated independently, and diagnoses were made on the basis of objective criteria. The degree of diagnostic agreement for the two examinations was calculated using the kappa statistic. Agreement was found to be high as compared to other studies in the psychiatric literature, despite the fact that in most previous investigations diagnoses were not made independently. The results were also compared to studies of reliability of medical judgments. Possible reasons for the high interrater reliability are discussed and include the use of a structured interview and objective diagnostic criteria.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Oct 25, 1976.

Reprint requests to Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, 4940 Audubon Ave, St. Louis, MO 63110 (Dr Helzer).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Burden of Mental Disorders
Eaton et al.
Epidemiol Rev 2008;30:1-14.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Population-Based Twin Study of Major Depression in Women: The Impact of Varying Definitions of Illness
Kendler et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992;49:257-266.
ABSTRACT  

The Predictive Validity of Lay Diagnostic Interview Schedule Diagnoses in the General Population: A Comparison With Physician Examiners
Helzer et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1987;44:1069-1077.
ABSTRACT  

A Self-Report Scale to Diagnose Major Depressive Disorder
Zimmerman et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1986;43:1076-1081.
ABSTRACT  

A Comparison of Clinical and Diagnostic Interview Schedule Diagnoses: Physician Reexamination of Lay-Interviewed Cases in the General Population
Helzer et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1985;42:657-666.
ABSTRACT  

Assortative Mating, Social Adjustment, and Course of Illness in Primary Affective Disorder
Merikangas et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1983;40:795-800.
ABSTRACT  

The Choice of Diagnostic Criteria for Biological Research
Kendell
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1982;39:1334-1339.
ABSTRACT  

A Comparison of Two Interview Schedules: The Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Lifetime and the National Institute for Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule
Hesselbrock et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1982;39:674-677.
ABSTRACT  

Predictive Validity of DSM-III and Feighner Definitions of Schizophrenia: A Comparison With Research Diagnostic Criteria and CATEGO
Helzer et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1981;38:791-797.
ABSTRACT  

Renard Diagnostic Interview: Its Reliability and Procedural Validity With Physicians and Lay Interviewers
Helzer et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1981;38:393-398.
ABSTRACT  

Reliability of Lifetime Diagnosis: A Multicenter Collaborative Perspective
Andreasen et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1981;38:400-405.
ABSTRACT  

Reliability Studies of Psychiatric Diagnosis: Theory and Practice
Grove et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1981;38:408-413.
ABSTRACT  

Reliability of Psychiatric Diagnosis in Hospitalized Adolescents: Interrater Agreement Using DSM-III
Strober et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1981;38:141-145.
ABSTRACT  

A Blind Family History Study of Briquet's Syndrome: Further Validation of the Diagnosis
Coryell
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1980;37:1266-1269.
ABSTRACT  

Blindness and Reliability in Lifetime Psychiatric Diagnosis
Mazure and Gershon
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1979;36:521-525.
ABSTRACT  

A Computer Program for Assessing Specific Category Rater Agreement for Qualitative Data
Cicchetti et al.
Educational and Psychological Measurement 1978;38:805-813.
ABSTRACT  

Concurrent Diagnostic Validity of a Structured Psychiatric Interview
Helzer et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1978;35:849-853.
ABSTRACT  

The Psychiatric Status Schedule as a Measure of Dimensions of Psychopathology in the General Population
Dohrenwend et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1978;35:731-737.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1977 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.