You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 35 No. 4, April 1978 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Methylphenidate vs Dextroamphetamine vs Caffeine in Minimal Brain Dysfunction

Controlled Comparison by Placebo Washout Design With Bayes' Analysis

L. Eugene Arnold, MD; James Christopher, MD; Robert Huestis, MD; Donald J. Smeltzer, MA

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1978;35(4):463-473.


Abstract

• Double-blind crossover comparison of methylphenidate hydrochloride, dextroamphetamine sulfate, and caffeine after placebo washout in 29 children with minimal brain dysfunction (MBD) showed on six ratings that methylphenidate and dextroamphetamine were significantly (P <.05 to P <.001) better than placebo and caffeine, but not significantly (P <.05) different from each other. Placebo, caffeine, and ratings before drug did not differ significantly. Of 26 drug responders, 12 responded best to dextroamphetamine, ten to methylphenidate, and one to caffeine. The latter child showed no improvement at all with either prescription stimulant. Methylphenidate and dextroamphetamine were each efficacious for six children who did not respond to the other stimulant. All three drugs showed significant (P <.05) weight loss and cardiovascular side effects, the latter possibly spurious. Dextroamphetamine showed a significant (P <.05) decrease from placebo in "tummyaches."



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Child Psychiatry, Ohio State University.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 31, 1977.

Reprint requests to Division of Child Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Ohio State University, 473 W 12th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 (Dr Arnold).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Practice Parameter for the Use of Stimulant Medications in the Treatment of Children, Adolescents, and Adults
Greenhill et al.
Focus 2004;2:642-668.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Efficacy of a Mixed Amphetamine Salts Compound in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Spencer et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001;58:775-782.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of caffeine on cognitive, psychomotor, and affective performance of children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Leon
J Atten Disord 2000;4:27-47.
ABSTRACT  

Methyiphenidate vs. amphetamine: Comparative review
Arnold
J Atten Disord 2000;3:200-211.
ABSTRACT  

Mouse Model of Hyperkinesis Implicates SNAP-25 in Behavioral Regulation
Hess et al.
J. Neurosci. 1996;16:3104-3111.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Behavioral and Cognitive Effects of Methylxanthines: A Meta-analysis of Theophylline and Caffeine
Stein et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1996;150:284-288.
ABSTRACT  

The Role of Methylphenidate in Psychiatry
Klein and Wender
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1995;52:429-433.
ABSTRACT  

Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Laird and Saklad
Journal of Pharmacy Practice 1990;3:241-251.
ABSTRACT  

The Health Consequences of Caffeine
CURATOLO and ROBERTSON
ANN INTERN MED 1983;98:641-653.
ABSTRACT  

Psychotropic Drugs and Learning Problems--A Selective Review
Aman
J Learn Disabil 1980;13:87-97.
ABSTRACT  

Megavitamins for Minimal Brain Dysfunction: A Placebo-Controlled Study
Arnold et al.
JAMA 1978;240:2642-2643.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1978 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.