You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 36 No. 11, October 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Comparison of DSM-II and DSM-III in the Diagnosis of Childhood Psychiatric Disorders

I. Agreement With Expected Diagnosis

Dennis P. Cantwell, MD; Andrew T. Russell, MD; Richard Mattison, MD; Lois Will, MA

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1979;36(11):1208-1213.


Abstract

• This study was conducted to compare DSM-II and DSM-III in the diagnosis of childhood and adolescent psychiatric disorders. Twenty psychiatrist-raters completed standardized diagnostic questionnaires for 24 actual case histories. This report, the first of four, presents the rater agreement with the "expected diagnosis," ie, the diagnosis that we considered most appropriate for each case. The average rater agreement with the expected diagnosis was less than 50%. It was highest in cases of mental retardation, psychosis, hyperactivity, and conduct disorder. In only five cases did the most common diagnosis of the raters differ from the expected diagnosis. Analyses of these cases and those we selected to present specific diagnostic problems to the raters have produced suggestions to improve the reliability of DSM-III.



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Mental Retardation and Child Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Neuropsychiatric Institute, University of California at Los Angeles Center for the Health Sciences.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Nov 16, 1978.

Reprint requests to Neuropsychiatric Institute, University of California at Los Angeles Center for the Health Sciences, 760 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90024 (Dr Cantwell).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Children's Anxiety and Phobic Disorders in School Settings: Classification, Assessment, and Intervention Issues
King and Ollendick
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH 1989;59:431-470.
ABSTRACT  

Reliability in the DSM-III Field Trials: Interview v Case Summary
Hyler et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1982;39:1275-1278.
ABSTRACT  

Reliability of Psychiatric Diagnosis in Hospitalized Adolescents: Interrater Agreement Using DSM-III
Strober et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1981;38:141-145.
ABSTRACT  

DSM-III vs DSM-II: How Much More Reliable?
Milich
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1980;37:1426-1426.
ABSTRACT  

A Comparison of DSM-II and DSM-III in the Diagnosis of Childhood Psychiatric Disorders: II. Interrater Agreement
Mattison et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1979;36:1217-1222.
ABSTRACT  

A Comparison of DSM-II and DSM-III in the Diagnosis of Childhood Psychiatric Disorders: III. Multiaxial Features
Russell et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1979;36:1223-1226.
ABSTRACT  

A Comparison of DSM-II and DSM-III in the Diagnosis of Childhood Psychiatric Disorders: IV. Difficulties in Use, Global Comparison, and Conclusions
Cantwell et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1979;36:1227-1228.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1979 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.