You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 36 No. 3, March 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Therapeutic Community as a Research Ward

Myths and Facts

David L. Braff, MD; John Bachman, PhD; Ira D. Glick, MD; Reese Jones, MD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1979;36(3):355-360.


Abstract

• The clinical research ward run as a therapeutic community has been criticized as inefficient and scientifically unsound. This article discusses the therapeutic community as a research ward and identifies certain misconceptions which underlie many criticisms. The following myths are discussed and refuted: (1) There is an insurmountable community-research chasm. (2) The therapeutic community induces stress that interferes with research. (3) Patient passivity is engendered by research and this is destructive to the therapeutic community. (4) Symptoms are exacerbated by a research ward that is disruptive to the community. (5) Normal research subjects cannot live in a therapeutic community without pathologic psychic changes. These inaccurate myths are seen as a reflection of attempts to oversimplify very complex clinical and research issues. The use of mythology to simplify experiments, to artificially "clarify" complex issues, or to "protect" patients is seen as a disservice. The therapeutic community and research are syntonic when both receive appropriate support.



Author Affiliations

From the Langley Porter Neuropsychiatric Institute, University of California, San Francisco. Dr Braff is now with the Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla. Dr Glick is now with the Department of Psychiatry, Cornell University School of Medicine, Payne Whitney Psychiatric Clinic, New York.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Sept 5, 1978.

Reprint requests to Department of Psychiatry M-003, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 (Dr Braff).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Effect of Psychobiological Research on Treatment Outcome: A Controlled Study
Kocsis et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1981;38:511-515.
ABSTRACT  

Research as an Impetus to Improved Treatment
Carroll et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1980;37:377-380.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1979 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.