 |
 |

The Erythrocyte Lithium-Plasma Lithium Ratio in Patients With Primary Affective Disorder
T. A. Ramsey, MD;
A. Frazer, PhD;
J. Mendels, MD;
W. L. Dyson, MD
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1979;36(4):457-461.
Abstract
 |  |
Increasing attention has been given to the significance of intra-cellular concentrations of the lithium ion in patients treated with this drug. The erythrocyte has been the most common cell investigated because of its accessibility and certain similarities between the ion transport mechanisms of this cell and the neuron. Intraerythrocyte lithium is expressed as the ratio of lithium in the cell to the plasma lithium concentration (lithium ratio). The lithium ratio has been reported to be related to a number of clinical variables, including treatment response, clinical state, side-effects, toxicity, diagnosis, and electrophysiological effects. We have investigated the lithium ratio in a large series of patients with a primary affective disorder and in a smaller control group. We found a significantly higher mean lithium ratio in the bipolar diagnostic group than in the unipolar and control groups. There was a trend, not statistically significant, in the unipolar and bipolar groups for females to have higher lithium ratios than males. While not diagnostic, the lithium ratio appears to be another biological variable where bipolar patients, as a group, differ from normals and others with an affective disorder.
Author Affiliations
From the Departments of Psychiatry, Veterans Administration Hospital and the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
Footnotes
Accepted for publication Jan 8, 1978.
Reprint requests to Affective Diseases Research Unit (151 E), Veterans Administration Hospital, University and Woodland Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (Dr Ramsey).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Lithium Ratio In Vitro: Diagnosis and Lithium Carbonate Response in Psychotic Patients
Garver et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1984;41:497-505.
ABSTRACT
|