You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 37 No. 1, January 1980 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (27)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) Program

Toxicologic Verification of 1,008 Emergency Room 'Mentions'

J. Thomas Ungerleider, MD; George D. Lundberg, MD; Irving Sunshine, PhD; Clifford B. Walberg, PhD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1980;37(1):106-109.


Abstract

• One thousand eight emergency room patient records from which reports were contributed to the federal Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) system from the Los Angeles County/ University of Southern California Medical Center in 1977 were studied. The drugs reported to DAWN for these patients were compared with the available toxicology laboratory reports for some of these same patients. The purpose was to test the validity of the data reported to DAWN. Toxicologic analyses had been performed on only 528 patients (52%) of the entire sample. Eighty percent of these tested patients had some positive toxicology result. The DAWN reports were verified in 20% of the tested sample, found to be incorrect in 11% and partially correct or partially incorrect in 69%. Drugs identified toxicologically had varied concentrations, some below or within therapeutic range and some at toxic levels. Thisstudy suggests that the reliability of DAWN reports should be tested prospectively in an unbiased definitive material study.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Psychiatry, University of California, Los Angeles, School of Medicine (Dr Ungerleider); the Department of Pathology, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine (Dr Lundberg); the Department of Toxicology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland (Dr Sunshine); and the Department of Pathology, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles (Dr Walberg).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 23, 1979.

Reprint requests to UCLA Center for the Health Sciences, Neuropsychiatric Institute, 760 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90024 (Dr Ungerleider).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Drug Prices and Emergency Department Mentions for Cocaine and Heroin
Caulkins
AJPH 2001;91:1446-1448.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prescription Drug Diversion Control and Medical Practice
Cooper et al.
JAMA 1992;268:1306-1310.
ABSTRACT  

Discrepancies in the Reported Frequency of Cocaine-Related Deaths, United States, 1983 Through 1988
Pollock et al.
JAMA 1991;266:2233-2237.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1980 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.