You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 37 No. 5, May 1980 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (110)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Success and Failure in Time-Limited Psychotherapy

A Systematic Comparison of Two Cases: Comparison 1

Hans H. Strupp, PhD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1980;37(5):595-603.


Abstract

• Why do some patients succeed in psychotherapy whereas others fail? Moreover, what can be learned from a comparison of two comparable patients treated by the same therapist under very similar conditions? Two cases drawn from the Vanderbilt Psychotherapy Project, a controlled study of process and outcome, were studied with a view toward deepening scientific and clinical understanding of time-limited psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Analyses of this kind are also important because the typical psychotherapy outcome study largely ignores individual cases entering into data of "average improvement." Based on systematic outcome and process measures, combined with a detailed study of complete process recordings, the case histories presented herein were those of two young men suffering from anxiety, depression, and social withdrawal who were treated by the same psychotherapist. The results of this analysis, the first of a series, suggest that therapy outcomes are importantly determined by the patient's ability to take advantage of the particular relationship the therapist has to offer; conversely, therapy fails if there is a poor match on these dimensions. Pertinent variables are further specified.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Nov 15, 1978.

Reprint requests to Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, 134 Wesley Hall, Nashville, TN 37240 (Dr Strupp).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Change Processes in Family Therapy with Hispanic Adolescents
Robbins et al.
Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 2002;24:505-519.
ABSTRACT  

Toward Science-Practice Integration in Brief Counseling and Therapy
Steenbarger
The Counseling Psychologist 1992;20:403-450.
ABSTRACT  

A Comparative Outcome Study of Individual, Group, and Conjoint Psychotherapy
Pilkonis et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1984;41:431-437.
ABSTRACT  

Success and Failure in Time-Limited Psychotherapy: Further Evidence (Comparison 4)
Strupp
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1980;37:947-954.
ABSTRACT  

Success and Failure in Time-Limited Psychotherapy: With Special Reference to the Performance of a Lay Counselor
Strupp
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1980;37:831-841.
ABSTRACT  

Success and Failure in Time-Limited Psychotherapy: A Systematic Comparison of Two Cases: Comparison 2
Strupp
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1980;37:708-716.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1980 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.