You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 38 No. 5, May 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Measuring Outcome in Psychodynamic Psychotherapy

Psychodynamic vs Symptomatic Assessment

Jim Mintz, PhD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1981;38(5):503-506.


Abstract

• Malan has argued forcefully that meaningful measurement of outcome in psychoanalytically oriented psychotherapy requires a complex clinical-judgment process by an expert clinician that is based on a psychodynamic hypothesis. Information pertaining only to symptom status before and after treatment was abstracted from each of 18 case summaries published by Malan. Each of these abstracted "cases" was rated by a nonprofessional judge for global improvement and by me for symptomatic improvement. Correlations among these simple outcome ratings, "dynamic assessments" of treatment outcome made by the Tavistock group, and several theoretically important variables measuring transference manifestations during treatment were examined. Simple symptomatic improvement was an important component of the complex Tavistock outcome rating. The results raised questions as to the importance of the expert clinician and the psychodynamic hypothesis in the assessment of treatment outcome.



Author Affiliations

From the Brentwood Veterans Administration Medical Center, and the Department of Psychiatry, University of California, Los Angeles.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 24, 1980.

Reprint requests to Brentwood VA Medical Center (530/116A21), Wilshire and Sawtelle boulevards, Los Angeles, CA 90073.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Therapist Affect Focus and Patient Outcomes in Psychodynamic Psychotherapy: A Meta-Analysis
Diener et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2007;164:936-941.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessment of Change in Dynamic Psychotherapy
Høglend et al.
J. Psychother. Pract. Res. 2000;9:190-199.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Development of an Individualized, Problem-Oriented Psychiatric Outcome Measure
Stevenson et al.
Eval Health Prof 1989;12:134-158.
ABSTRACT  

A Proposed Method for Measuring Change Beyond Symptoms
Weiss et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1985;42:703-708.
ABSTRACT  

A Comparative Outcome Study of Individual, Group, and Conjoint Psychotherapy
Pilkonis et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1984;41:431-437.
ABSTRACT  

Judging Change in Psychotherapy: Reliability of Clinical Formulations
DeWitt et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1983;40:1121-1128.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.