You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 38 No. 5, May 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (16)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Effect of Psychobiological Research on Treatment Outcome

A Controlled Study

James H. Kocsis, MD; Allen Frances, MD; Thomas P. Kalman, MD; M. Katherine Shear, MD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1981;38(5):511-515.


Abstract

• Recent advances in psychiatric research methodology promise major progress. Simultaneously, however, mounting concerns about ethics of human experimentation have resulted in increased scrutiny and regulation that threaten scientific productivity. Virtually no systematic data have been gathered about the effects of research participation on treatment outcome or patient satisfaction. In this study 56 hospitalized depressed patients, who had agreed to participate in psychobiological research protocols, were then randomly assigned to treatment on a research unit or on standard adult inpatient (nonresearch) units. Research participants received more diagnosis-related somatic treatments, had a longer mean length of stay, and experienced trends toward greater symptom reduction and better consumer satisfaction. We conclude that research participation may be helpful to patients but that more systematic study is needed to help to resolve ethical questions and to assist risk-benefit evaluations.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Psychiatry, Payne Whitney Clinic, New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, New York.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Feb 8, 1980.

Read before the 132nd annual meeting of the American Psychiatric Association, Chicago, May 16, 1979.

Reprint requests to Department of Psychiatry, Payne Whitney Clinic, New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, 525 E 68th St, New York, NY 10021 (Dr Kocsis).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Psychometric Analysis of Project Liberty's Adult Enhanced Services Referral Tool
Norris et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 2006;57:1328-1334.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessing the Subjective Experience of Being a Participant in Psychiatric Research
Marshall et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2001;158:319-321.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Rationale and Ethics of Medication-Free Research in Schizophrenia
Carpenter et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1997;54:401-407.
ABSTRACT  

Patient Satisfaction: What we Know about and What we Still Need to Explore
Aharony and Strasser
Med Care Res Rev 1993;50:49-79.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.