This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

A Review

Wolfgang Linden, Dipl-Psych

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1981;38(7):769-775.

Abstract
• The effectiveness of in vivo exposure is evaluated in a comprehensive review of outcome studies on phobia treatments. A strictly data-based analysis focuses on issues of analog vs clinical research, methodological quality of designs, utilization of generalization measures, and maintenance of therapeutic change. In vivo exposure appears to be an effective treatment, both short- and long-term, and some decision rules for the clinical application are provided. However, from a researcher's point of view many methodological weaknesses (such as frequent lack of follow-up; unrealistic behavioral measures; and the utilization of unnecessarily complicated, and at times confusing, designs) are noted. A considerable consensus on the major procedural variables and on positive overall outcome justifies the clinical utility of the procedure. Detailed suggestions for further treatment comparisons are outlined, and a cautionary note on the potential of such a data-based review are added.

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal.

Footnotes
Accepted for publication Aug 21, 1980.

Reprints not available.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?