You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 39 No. 11, November 1982 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (20)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Stone-Roth Model of Civil Commitment and the California Dangerousness Standard

Operational Comparison

John Monahan, PhD; Mary Ruggiero, MA; Herbert D. Friedlander, MD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982;39(11):1267-1271.


Abstract

• Professional opposition to making "dangerousness" the primary criterion for involuntary civil commitment has galvanized in support of the proposed "new medical model." The Stone-Roth criteria for commitment were applied to patients being committed under California's version of the dangerousness standard. Results showed that 86% of the patients committed under the California statute were viewed by the examining psychiatrists as committable under the Stone-Roth procedures as well.



Author Affiliations

From the University of Virginia School of Law, Charlottesville (Dr Monahan); and the Program in Social Ecology (Ms Ruggiero) and Medical Center (Dr Friedlander), University of California, Irvine.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Feb 11,1982.

Reprint requests to University of Virginia School of Law, Charlottesville, VA 22901 (Dr Monahan).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Civil Commitment in the Psychiatric Emergency Room: I. The Assessment of Dangerousness by Emergency Room Clinicians
Segal et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988;45:748-752.
ABSTRACT  

Civil Commitment in the Psychiatric Emergency Room: II. Mental Disorder Indicators and Three Dangerousness Criteria
Segal et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988;45:753-758.
ABSTRACT  

Limitations on Psychiatrists' Discretionary Civil Commitment Authority by the Stone and Dangerousness Criteria
Hoge et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988;45:764-769.
ABSTRACT  

Civil Commitment of the Mentally Ill: An Overview
MILLS
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 1986;484:28-41.
ABSTRACT  

Empirical Assessment of Innovation in the Law of Civil Commitment: A Critique
Appelbaum
J Law Med Ethics 1985;13:304-309.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1982 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.