You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 39 No. 4, April 1982 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (21)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Decision to Seek Commitment

Psychiatric Decision Making in a Legal Context

Paul S. Appelbaum, MD; Robert M. Hamm, PhD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1982;39(4):447-451.


Abstract

• In seeking to commit patients, psychiatrists have often been accused of pursuing ends other than those prescribed by the law, but empiric data have been lacking on those factors that influence commitment decisions. In this study 34 clinicians, most of whom were psychiatrists, responded to 65 requests by voluntary patients for discharge from the hospital. The legal criteria governing commitment were found to be significantly related to the decision. Those nonlegal criteria that seemed most consistently to play a significant role in the decision seemed closely related to one of the legal criteria. The clinicians' affective responses to their patients and the patients' personality traits did not play a significant role in the decision. These findings suggest that this group of clinicians was acting in substantial accordance with the dangerousness requirements of the commitment law.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Psychiatry, Program in Law and Psychiatry, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine (Dr Appelbaum), and the Division of Primary Care and Family Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Dr Hamm).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication June 9, 1981.

Reprint requests to Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, 3811 O'Hara St, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 (Dr Appelbaum).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Lawyers' Attitudes Toward Involuntary Treatment
Luchins et al.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 2006;34:492-500.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

To Commit or Not to Commit: The Psychiatry Resident as a Variable in Involuntary Commitment Decisions
Sattar et al.
Acad. Psychiatry 2006;30:191-195.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Psychiatrists' Attitudes Toward Involuntary Hospitalization
Luchins et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 2004;55:1058-1060.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinicians' Decision Making About Involuntary Commitment
Engleman et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 1998;49:941-945.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Indexing Civil Commitment in Psychiatric Emergency Rooms
SEGAL et al.
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 1986;484:56-69.
ABSTRACT  

Clinical Judgments in the Decision to Commit: Psychiatric Discretion and the Law
Schwartz et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1984;41:811-815.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1982 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.