You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 40 No. 10, October 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Judging Change in Psychotherapy

Reliability of Clinical Formulations

Kathryn N. DeWitt, PhD; Nancy B. Kaltreider, MD; Daniel S. Weiss, PhD; Mardi J. Horowitz, MD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983;40(10):1121-1128.


Abstract

• Careful clinical formulation describing the dimensions of core neurotic conflicts is integral to the practice of psychodynamic psychotherapy. Therefore, a method for reliable and valid formulation is a necessary precursor for the empirical investigation of the impact of such therapy. Our study evaluated a method of outcome assessment based on clinical formulations. Results from 18 patients indicate that independently derived formulations of a central conflict do not agree and that these disagreements in formulation are reflected in disagreements in the change ratings that are based on them. Additional analyses suggested that symptomatic change represents the major component in outcome rating.



Author Affiliations

From the Center for the Study of Neuroses, Langley Porter Psychiatric Institute, San Francisco.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 28, 1982.

Read in part at the annual meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, Asilomar, Calif, June 20, 1980.

Reprint requests to Langley Porter Psychiatric Institute, 401 Parnassus, San Francisco, CA 94143 (Dr DeWitt).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Piecing the Puzzle Together:: A Model for Understanding the Theory-Practice Relationship
Hansen and Freimuth
The Counseling Psychologist 1997;25:654-673.
ABSTRACT  

Can Analysts Agree? The Problems of Consensus and the Psychoanalytic Mannequin: I. A Proposed Solution
Caston
J Am Psychoanal Assoc 1993;41:493-511.
ABSTRACT  

The Development of an Individualized, Problem-Oriented Psychiatric Outcome Measure
Stevenson et al.
Eval Health Prof 1989;12:134-158.
ABSTRACT  

Clinicians Can Agree in Assessing Relationship Patterns in Psychotherapy: The Core Conflictual Relationship Theme Method
Crits-Christoph et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988;45:1001-1004.
ABSTRACT  

A Proposed Method for Measuring Change Beyond Symptoms
Weiss et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1985;42:703-708.
ABSTRACT  

Psychotherapy: Scientific Art or Artistic Science?
Glass
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1984;41:525-526.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1983 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.