You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 40 No. 8, August 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (21)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Methadyl Acetate (LAAM) in the Treatment of Heroin Addicts

II. Double-blind Comparison of Gradual and Abrupt Detoxification

Barbara A. Judson, MS; Avram Goldstein, MD; Charles E. Inturrisi, PhD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983;40(8):834-840.


Abstract



• One hundred nineteen patients were admitted to a sixmonth (26-week) prenaltrexone detoxification program comparing abrupt and gradual withdrawal from methadyl acetate (LAAM) therapy. All patients were brought to a maintenance level of 50, 50, and 65 mg (Monday, Wednesday, and Friday). Patients randomly assigned to the gradual group (group G) began a 4-mg/wk reduction the Monday of week 9 and reached zero dosage (placebo) the Monday of week 23; patients in the abrupt group (group A) continued to receive 50,50, and 65 mg until the Monday of week 23, when their dosage was dropped to zero (placebo). All patients were given placebo for four weeks. This study showed the superiority of abrupt withdrawal over this gradual-withdrawal schedule. Forty-six percent of group A compared with 28% of group G made the transition to naltrexone treatment. Severity of withdrawal problems was in no case significantly greater in group A.



Author Affiliations



From the Addiction Research Foundation, Palo Alto, Calif (Ms Judson and Dr Goldstein); and the Department of Pharmacology, Cornell University Medical College, New York (Dr Inturrisi).


Footnotes



Accepted for publication June 21, 1982.

Reprint requests to Addiction Research Foundation, 701 Welch Rd, Palo Alto, CA 94304 (Dr Goldstein).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1983 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.