You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 41 No. 2, February 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Testing Four Diagnostic Systems for Schizophrenia

Thomas H. McGlashan, MDN

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1984;41(2):141-144.


Abstract

• Four diagnostic systems for schizophrenia—New Haven, Feighner et al, Research Diagnostic Criteria, and DSM-III— were tested for reliability, comprehensiveness, concordance with established clinical use, specificity, and predictive validity. The sample consisted of 400 patients admitted to Chestnut Lodge, Rockville, Md, 330 of whom received long-term followup assessment by interview an average of 15 years after discharge. Diagnostic system criteria were applied retrospectively to abstracted medical records. Findings replicated recent studies on schizophrenia diagnosis and extended the generalizability of current nosologic systems to chronically ill patients. Results also indirectly supported the validity of applying these systems to medical records. This study demonstrated advantages and disadvantages of each system.



Author Affiliations

From the Chestnut Lodge Research Institute, Rockville, Md.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 24, 1983.

Reprint requests to Chestnut Lodge Research Institute, 500 W Montgomery Ave, Rockville, MD 20850 (Dr McGlashan).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Competing Definitions of Schizophrenia: What Can Be Learned From Polydiagnostic Studies?
Jansson and Parnas
Schizophr Bull 2007;33:1178-1200.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

First-Episode Psychosis: Psychopathology, Quality of Life, and Functional Outcome
Malla and Payne
Schizophr Bull 2005;31:650-671.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Adult Outcomes of Child- and Adolescent-Onset Schizophrenia: Diagnostic Stability and Predictive Validity
Hollis
Am. J. Psychiatry 2000;157:1652-1659.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is DSM-IV Needed at All?
Zimmerman
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1990;47:974-976.
ABSTRACT  

'Cause the Bible Tells Me So: Jesus loves me, this I know 'cause the Bible tells me so.
Winokur et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988;45:683-684.
ABSTRACT  

The Prediction of Outcome in Chronic Schizophrenia: IV. The Chestnut Lodge Follow-up Study
McGlashan
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1986;43:167-176.
ABSTRACT  

The Chestnut Lodge Follow-up Study: I. Follow-up Methodology and Study Sample
McGlashan
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1984;41:573-585.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.