You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 41 No. 2, February 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Outcome of Schizophrenic Subtypes Defined by Four Diagnostic Systems

Kenneth S. Kendler, MD; Alan M. Gruenberg, MD; Ming T. Tsuang, MD, PhD, DSc

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1984;41(2):149-154.


Abstract

• This report examines the short- and long-term outcome of the subtypes of schizophrenia as defined by four diagnostic systems: DSM-III, Research Diagnostic Criteria, Ninth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases, and the Tsuang-Winokur (T-W) criteria. Patients were from the Iowa 500 study and met Washington University criteria for schizophrenia. Subtype diagnosis was based on extensive chart material reviewed by investigators blind to outcome. Short-term outcome, based on chart information, and long-term outcome, based on individual field follow-up, were both better for paranoid than for nonparanoid schizophrenia, the difference being greatest using the T-W criteria. The difference in outcome between paranoid and nonparanoid schizophrenia was greater at long-term than at short-term follow-up, and greater using residential and occupational than psychiatric outcome criteria. Outcome did not differ for the two common forms of nonparanoid schizophrenia: hebephrenic and undifferentiated. The subtyping of schizophrenia has important predictive validity, which was greatest using the T-W criteria.



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Psychiatry and Human Genetics, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond (Dr Kendler); the Yale Psychiatric Institute, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (Dr Gruenberg); and the Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University, and the Psychiatric Epidemiology Research Unit, Butler Hospital, Providence, RI (Dr Tsuang).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 18, 1983.

Reprint requests to Psychiatric Epidemiology Research Unit, Butler Hospital, 345 Blackstone Blvd, Providence, RI 02906 (Dr Tsuang).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Competing Definitions of Schizophrenia: What Can Be Learned From Polydiagnostic Studies?
Jansson and Parnas
Schizophr Bull 2007;33:1178-1200.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Natural History of Schizophrenia Subtypes: I. Longitudinal Study of Paranoid, Hebephrenic, and Undifferentiated Schizophrenia
Fenton and McGlashan
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1991;48:969-977.
ABSTRACT  

Toward a Scientific Psychiatric Nosology: Strengths and Limitations
Kendler
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1990;47:969-973.
ABSTRACT  

Outcome and Familial Psychopathology in Schizophrenia
Kendler and Tsuang
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988;45:338-346.
ABSTRACT  

Schizophrenics With Tardive Dyskinesia: Neuropsychological Deficit and Family Psychopathology
Wegner et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1985;42:860-865.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.