 |
|
A Study of Mandatory Review of Civil Commitment
Jerome A. Yesavage, MD
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1984;41(3):305-308.
Abstract
| |
• The California Civil Commitment Statute provides for prolonged (14-day) involuntary hospitalization of the mentally ill on the basis of grave disability (GD), danger to self, and danger to others. Recently the procedure has been modified to provide mandatory review of all 14-day certificates for GD. Comparison of 47 patients certified before the law change with 58 subjects certified after the change found that correlations between certification category and criterion measures were significant but low. Although the change was directed toward GD, no significant improvement was seen in the specificity of application of the GD category after the legal change. Because of these limited effects, the value of time-consuming mandatory judicial review is questionable. The attempt may have been doomed from the start because of unquantifiable commitment criteria. Before additional judicial burdens are imposed on the psychiatrist, careful assessment of the rationale for such procedures should be made.
Author Affiliations
From the Veterans Administration Medical Center, Palo Alto, Calif, and the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford (Calif) University School of Medicine.
Footnotes
Accepted for publication March 25, 1983.
Reprint requests to Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305 (Dr Yesavage).
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Civil Commitment in the Psychiatric Emergency Room: I. The Assessment of Dangerousness by Emergency Room Clinicians
Segal et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988;45:748-752.
ABSTRACT
|
