You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 41 No. 5, May 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Comparative Diagnostic Criteria for Melancholia and Endogenous Depression

Jonathan Davidson, MD; Craig Turnbull, PhD; Rosemary Strickland, RN, MSN; Michael Belyea, PhD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1984;41(5):506-511.


Abstract

• Five scales were evaluated for the diagnosis of melancholia or endogenous depression. Of 21 total items, none appeared in all five scales, but four items occurred in four of the scales: autonomy of mood, pervasive anhedonia, psychomotor change, and guilt. Vegetative changes were represented inconsistently, with anorexia and weight loss in three scales, as was distinct quality of mood. Thereafter, item agreement between the scales fell off. Scale performance was tested in 50 depressive patients. Major differences were found in frequency of melancholia and scale orientation toward inpatients and outpatients. A number of old controversies remain dormant in these scales. Unresolved are the relationship between melancholia and severity of depression; the relevance of precipitating events, previous depressive episodes, type of onset, and adequacy of personality; and whether to classify by category or continuum. The merits of statistically and consensually derived scales also need to be evaluated.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Psychiatry, Duke University Medical Center (Dr Davidson) and Veterans Administration Medical Center (Dr Davidson and Ms Strickland), Durham, NC; and the Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina (Drs Turnbull and Belyea), Chapel Hill, NC.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Dec 8, 1983.

Reprint requests to Department of Psychiatry, VA Medical Center, 508 Fulton St, Durham, NC 27705 (Dr Davidson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Is DSM-IV Needed at All?
Zimmerman
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1990;47:974-976.
ABSTRACT  

Predictors of Drug Response in Depression
Joyce and Paykel
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989;46:89-99.
ABSTRACT  

Melancholia
Paykel
J Psychopharmacol 1987;1:67-70.
 

The Validity of the Dexamethasone Suppression Test as a Marker for Endogenous Depression
Zimmerman et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1986;43:347-355.
ABSTRACT  

The Validity of Four Definitions of Endogenous Depression: II. Clinical, Demographic, Familial, and Psychosocial Correlates
Zimmerman et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1986;43:234-244.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.