You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 41 No. 8, August 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (25)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Clinical Judgments in the Decision to Commit

Psychiatric Discretion and the Law

Harold I. Schwartz, MD; Paul S. Appelbaum, MD; Richard D. Kaplan, MD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1984;41(8):811-815.


Abstract

• Judicial decisions and statutory reforms point to a return to psychiatric discretion when clinical needs and patients' rights must be balanced. In seeking to commit patients, psychiatrists have been accused of contravening the legal rights of their patients by applying criteria other than those prescribed by law. This study examined the factors involved in the psychiatrists' decisions to seek commitment or to release 90 voluntarily hospitalized patients; we found psychiatrists' decisions to be appropriately correlated to legal criteria and legally relevant clinical and psychosocial factors. Interpersonal variables did not play a material role in the decision. Independent assessment of the patients' clinical status were consistent with clinicians' judgments of dangerousness. These findings indicate that this group of psychiatrists, faced with the decision to seek commitment, based their judgments on clinically relevant data rather than interpersonal factors and conformed to the dangerousness requirements of the commitment law.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Psychiatry, Payne Whitney Clinic, New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, New York (Drs Schwartz and Kaplan), and the Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh Schools of Medicine and Law (Dr Appelbaum).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Nov 9, 1983.

Reprint requests to 449 E 68th St, New York, NY 10021 (Dr Schwartz) until July 1; after July 1 to Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Medical Center, 10 Nathan D. Perlman Pl, New York, NY 10003 (Dr Schwartz).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Clinicians' Decision Making About Involuntary Commitment
Engleman et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 1998;49:941-945.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Methodological and Ethical Concerns Regarding Forensic Psychiatry Epidemiological Studies
Arboleda-Florez
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 1993;37:95-98.
 

Civil Commitment in the Psychiatric Emergency Room: II. Mental Disorder Indicators and Three Dangerousness Criteria
Segal et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988;45:753-758.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.