You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 42 No. 12, December 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Treatment Outcome Validation of DSM-III Depressive Subtypes

Clinical Usefulness in Outpatients With Mild to Moderate Depression

Jonathan W. Stewart, MD; Patrick J. McGrath, MD; Michael R. Liebowitz, MD; Wilma Harrison, MD; Frederic Quitkin, MD; Judith G. Rabkin, PhD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985;42(12):1148-1153.


Abstract

• An algorithm for transcribing Research Diagnostic Criteria diagnoses for depressive disorders to similar categories in the DSM-III was applied to 103 depressed outpatients previously diagnosed by Research Diagnostic Criteria. All had Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores of 18 or less. Among 64 patients completing a six-week, double-blind study comparing desipramine hydrochloride with placebo, desipramine was significantly more effective than placebo in patients with DSM-III major depression but not in those with dysthymic disorder. Among patients with major depression, a significant drug-placebo response difference was demonstrated even in those without melancholia. These findings support the clinical usefulness of the DSM-III in the treatment of depressed outpatients. Independent of DSM-III diagnosis, however, evidence of panic attacks seemed to identify patients who benefited from desipramine therapy. This suggests that the DSM-III hierarchy, which excludes consideration of panic in patients with major depression, may require revision.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and the New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 18, 1984.

Reprint requests to 722 W 168th St, New York, NY 10032 (Dr Stewart).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Placebo Response in Studies of Major Depression: Variable, Substantial, and Growing
Walsh et al.
JAMA 2002;287:1840-1847.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relevance of DMS-III Depressive Subtype and Chronicity of Antidepressant Efficacy in Atypical Depression: Differential Response to Phenelzine, Imipramine, and Placebo
Stewart et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989;46:1080-1087.
ABSTRACT  

An Efficacy Study of Isocarboxazid and Placebo in Depression, and Its Relationship to Depressive Nosology
Davidson et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988;45:120-127.
ABSTRACT  

Antidepressants: Their efficacy and place in therapy
Paykel
J Psychopharmacol 1988;2:105-118.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.