You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 42 No. 7, July 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Comparison of Two Diagnostic Methods

Clinical ICD Diagnoses vs DSM-III and Research Diagnostic Criteria Using the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (Version 2)

Hans-Ulrich Wittchen, PhD, Dipl-Psych; Gert Semler, Dipl-Psych; Detlev von Zerssen, MD, Dipl-Psych

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985;42(7):677-684.


Abstract

• In the context of a seven-year follow-up study, 171 former psychiatric inpatients and 158 subjects from the general population were interviewed twice, first with the German version of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) (version 2), and second with a clinical interview using the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Methodik und Dokumentation in der Psychiatrie (AMDP) checklist to assign a clinical International Classification of Diseases (eighth revision) (ICD-8) diagnosis, independent of the DIS. With the clinicians' ICD-8 diagnosis as a measure of the quality of the DIS, the results indicate (1) a sufficiently high overall specificity and sensitivity of the DIS as a case-finding instrument in a general population survey, and (2) a surprisingly high concordance of most DIS diagnostic classes with comparable ICD diagnoses. Only for panic disorders (possibly due to different symptom and time criteria) and schizophrenia (possibly due to the strict probe system, the dependence on self-reports, and time criteria) was low sensitivity found. Because there is no DIS diagnostic category comparable with ICD-8 unipolar affective psychosis, a meaningful comparison of this ICD category with Research Diagnostic Criteria and DSM-III was not possible.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Psychiatry, Unit for Evaluation Research, MaxPlanck-Institut für Psychiatrie, Munich.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Lifetime Prevalence, Demographic Risk Factors, and Diagnostic Validity of Nonaffective Psychosis as Assessed in a US Community Sample: The National Comorbidity Survey
Kendler et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1996;53:1022-1031.
ABSTRACT  

Social Phobia: Comorbidity and Morbidity in an Epidemiologic Sample
Schneier et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992;49:282-288.
ABSTRACT  

Psychopathologic Precursors and Sociodemographic Risk Factors for the Schizophrenia Syndrome
Tien and Eaton
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992;49:37-46.
ABSTRACT  

Panic Disorder, Comorbidity, and Suicide Attempts
Johnson et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1990;47:805-808.
ABSTRACT  

Development of Diagnostic Checklists for Use in Routine Clinical Care: A Guideline Designed to Assess DSM-III-R Diagnoses
Hiller et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1990;47:782-784.
ABSTRACT  

Factors Associated With 1-Year Outcome of Major Depression in the Community
Sargeant et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1990;47:519-526.
ABSTRACT  

Quality of Life in Panic Disorder
Markowitz et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989;46:984-992.
ABSTRACT  

Recall and Dating of Psychiatric Symptoms: Test-Retest Reliability of Time-Related Symptom Questions in a Standardized Psychiatric Interview
Wittchen et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989;46:437-443.
ABSTRACT  

The Composite International Diagnostic Interview: An Epidemiologic Instrument Suitable for Use in Conjunction With Different Diagnostic Systems and in Different Cultures
Robins et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988;45:1069-1077.
ABSTRACT  

One-Month Prevalence of Mental Disorders in the United States: Based on Five Epidemiologic Catchment Area Sites
Regier et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988;45:977-986.
ABSTRACT  

Screening Devices for Cognitive Capacity
STRAIN and FULOP
ANN INTERN MED 1987;107:583-585.
ABSTRACT  

Anxiety and Depression in a Primary Care Clinic: Comparison of Diagnostic Interview Schedule, General Health Questionnaire, and Practitioner Assessments
Von Korff et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1987;44:152-156.
ABSTRACT  

Diagnosis of Psychiatric Disorders in Epidemiologic Field Studies
Klerman
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1985;42:723-724.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.