This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Mark Zimmerman; William Coryell, MD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1986;43(5):468-470.

Abstract
• Twenty-one depressed inpatients were followed up for six months after hospital admission. One rater assessed the patients at monthly intervals, and an independent rater assessed symptoms and treatment for the same period at the end of the six-month follow-up. Ratings of audiotapes of the monthly interviews by a third rater achieved excellent reliability. Fair to excellent agreement was also found between the monthly and six-month interviews. Reliability was lowest during the first month of the follow-up period. Unexpectedly, at the six-month interview more rather than fewer symptoms were reported for the most remote part of the follow-up interval. Our results suggest that at the six-month interview patients had reevaluated their functioning for the immediate postdischarge period.

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City.

Footnotes
Accepted for publication Aug 20, 1985.

Reprint requests to Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa College of Medicine, 500 Newton Rd, Iowa City, IA 52242 (Mr Zimmerman).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Diagnostic Criteria for Melancholia: The Comparative Validity of DSM-III and DSM-III-R
Zimmerman et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989;46:361-368.
ABSTRACT