You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 45 No. 11, November 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Clinicians Can Agree in Assessing Relationship Patterns in Psychotherapy

The Core Conflictual Relationship Theme Method

Paul Crits-Christoph, PhD; Lester Luborsky, PhD; Laura Dahl; Carol Popp, MD, PhD; Jim Mellon; David Mark, PhD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988;45(11):1001-1004.


Abstract

• This study examines interjudge agreement on formulations of dynamic themes in psychotherapy, using a sessionbased method, namely, the Core Conflictual Relationship Theme. Agreement was assessed by two methods: one was based on themes that were tailor-made for each case, while the other was based on coding themes into a standard set of categories. To assess agreement on the tailor-made formulations, a paired-comparisons procedure was used. For a sample of 35 patients, the similarity ratings for matched cases were significantly higher than for purposely mismatched cases. Using the standard set of categories, agreement was also good; weighted K values ranged from.61 to.70. The results also demonstrate reliability for the location of the relationship episodes, which form the database for the Core Conflictual Relationship Theme. Our positive results suggest that this guided clinical method can be used reliably as a measure of relationship patterns in psychotherapy; our results provide the first moderate-sized sample demonstration of clinicians' agreement in formulating this complex concept.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Dec 14, 1987.

Reprint requests to 308 Piersol Bldg, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (Dr Crits-Christoph).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Repetition or Reparation?: An Exploratory Study of the Relationship Schemas of Child Molesters in Treatment
Drapeau
J Interpers Violence 2006;21:1224-1233.
ABSTRACT  

An Exploratory Study of Child Molesters' Relationship Patterns Using the Core Conflictual Relationship Theme Method
Drapeau et al.
J Interpers Violence 2004;19:264-275.
ABSTRACT  

Parental communication of Holocaust experiences and interpersonal patterns in offspring of Holocaust survivors
Wiseman et al.
International Journal of Behavioral Development 2002;26:371-381.
ABSTRACT  

Can Analysts Agree? The Problems of Consensus and the Psychoanalytic Mannequin: I. A Proposed Solution
Caston
J Am Psychoanal Assoc 1993;41:493-511.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.