You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 45 No. 8, August 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (115)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Diagnosing Personality Disorder in Depressed Patients

A Comparison of Patient and Informant Interviews

Mark Zimmerman; Bruce Pfohl, MD; William Coryell, MD; Dalene Stangl, MA; Caryn Corenthal, MA

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988;45(8):733-737.


Abstract

• Personality disorder (PD) diagnoses were made in 66 depressed patients based on independent interviews of the patient and a close informant. The patients and informants markedly differed in their descriptions of the patients' normal personality. The K coefficient of agreement for the diagnosis of any PD was.13, and all K values for the individual PD diagnoses were below.35. Informants reported more pathologic conditions than the patients, such that PDs were diagnosed in 57.6% (38/66) of the patients, based on the informant interview, and in 36.4% (24/66), based on the patient interview. We also examined dimensional scores. In general, we found only modest correlations between the patient and informant dimensional scores and that the ratings based on the informant interviews were higher. These results varied by specific PD diagnoses. Consensus ratings, which were based on both sources of information, were sometimes more strongly associated with patient information and sometimes with informant information, and this, too, varied among the different PDs.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Psychiatry, The University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Jan 14, 1988.

Reprint requests to Department of Psychiatry, The University of Iowa College of Medicine, 500 Newton Rd, Iowa City, IA 52242 (Mr Zimmerman).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Prevalence of DSM-IV Personality Disorders in Psychiatric Outpatients
Zimmerman et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2005;162:1911-1918.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Personality Dimensions in First-Episode Psychoses
Keshavan et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2005;162:102-109.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Psychiatric Patient- and Informant-Reported Personality: Predicting Concurrent and Future Behavior
Ready et al.
Assessment 2002;9:361-372.
ABSTRACT  

Complementary approaches to the assessment of personality disorder: The Personality Assessment Schedule and Adult Personality Functioning Assessment compared
HILL et al.
Br. J. Psychiatry 2000;176:434-438.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Peer Assessment of Personality Traits and Pathology in Female College Students
Oltmanns and Strauss
Assessment 1998;5:53-65.
ABSTRACT  

The Counterpoint of Personality Assessment: Self Reports and Observer Ratings
McCrae
Assessment 1994;1:159-172.
ABSTRACT  

Diagnosing Personality Disorders: A Review of Issues and Research Methods
Zimmerman
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1994;51:225-245.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.