You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 45 No. 8, August 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Limitations on Psychiatrists' Discretionary Civil Commitment Authority by the Stone and Dangerousness Criteria

Steven K. Hoge, MD; Gary Sachs, MD; Paul S. Appelbaum, MD; Alexander Greer, JD, MA; Christopher Gordon, MD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1988;45(8):764-769.


Abstract

• The dangerousness-oriented commitment criteria of Massachusetts were compared with the paternalistic Stone model of commitment in an emergency setting. In a sample of 1062 patients, the Stone criteria were more restrictive than the dangerousness-oriented criteria; 91 patients were committable by the Stone model compared with 218 under the present statute. A second comparison of only those patients who refused treatment yielded similar findings—52 patients were committable according to the Stone criteria compared with 80 under the Massachusetts statute. The greater restrictiveness of the Stone criteria in each comparison was in large part the result of the requirement that the treatment decisions of the patient be incompetent; in the broader sample, the criterion of major patient distress had a comparable impact. A comparison of patients committable under both standards with those patients currently committable who would be excluded under the Stone standard revealed significant differences. The dually committable patients were more likely to be psychotic, to meet statutory criteria for grave disability, and to be diagnosed as manic. The implications of the findings are discussed.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Psychiatry, the Law and Psychiatry Program (Drs Hoge and Appelbaum and Mr Greer) and the Forensic Evaluation Clinic (Drs Appelbaum and Hoge), Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, and the Department of Psychiatry, the Acute Psychiatry Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Drs Sachs and Gordon).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 8, 1988.

Reprint requests to Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, 55 Lake Ave N, Worcester, MA 01605 (Dr Hoge).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The 1983 Mental Health Act in Five Local Authorities: a Study of the Practice of Approved Social Workers
Hatfield et al.
Int J Soc Psychiatry 1992;38:189-207.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.