You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 46 No. 12, December 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Relevance of DMS-III Depressive Subtype and Chronicity of Antidepressant Efficacy in Atypical Depression

Differential Response to Phenelzine, Imipramine, and Placebo

Jonathan W. Stewart, MD; Patrick J. McGrath, MD; Fredric M. Quitkin, MD; Wilma Harrison, MD; Jeffrey Markowitz, DPH; Steven Wager, MD; Michael R. Leibowitz, MD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989;46(12):1080-1087.


Abstract

• One hundred ninety-four nonmelancholic depressed outpatients with features of atypical depression took part in a 6-week randomized trial of imipramine hydrochloride, phenelzine sulfate, and placebo. Their courses of illness were also rated for chronicity. Significantly more patients responded to phenelzine (71%) than to imipramine (48%), which benefited significantly more patients than placebo (26%). Both chronicity and DMS-III diagnosis predicted response on several outcome measures. For example, patients with dysthymic disorder responded better to treatment than did those with major depression, suggesting that dysthymic disorder can be treated with medication. Placebo response correlated inversely with chronicity, regardless of DMS-III diagnosis. Atypical depression and longitudinal course of illness may add to the usefulness of DMS-III depressive diagnosis as a predictor of antidepressant response.



Author Affiliations

From the New York State Psychiatric Institute and the Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication September 15, 1989

Reprint requests to 722 W 168th St. New York, NY 10032 (Dr Stewart)



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Meta-Analysis of Placebo Rates in Major Depressive Disorder Trials
Stolk et al.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2003;37:1891-1899.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Placebo Response in Studies of Major Depression: Variable, Substantial, and Growing
Walsh et al.
JAMA 2002;287:1840-1847.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Maintenance Therapy for Chronic Depression: A Controlled Clinical Trial of Desipramine
Kocsis et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1996;53:769-774.
ABSTRACT  

A Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Sertraline and Imipramine for the Treatment of Dysthymia
Thase et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1996;53:777-784.
ABSTRACT  

The management of treatment-resistant affective disorder: clinical perspectives
Malizia and Bridges
J Psychopharmacol 1992;6:145-155.
 

Atypical Depression, Panic Attacks, and Response to Imipramine and Phenelzine: A Replication
Quitkin et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1990;47:935-941.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.