You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 46 No. 4, April 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Effects of Insurance Generosity on the Psychological Distress and Psychological Well-being of a General Population

Kenneth B. Wells, MD, MPH; Willard G. Manning, Jr, PhD; R. Burciaga Valdez, PhD, MHSA

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989;46(4):315-320.


Abstract

• Reductions in the generosity of fee-for-service insurance lower the use of general medical and mental health services, but do they lead to lower mental health status for the covered population? We addressed this question using data from the RAND Corporation Health Insurance Experiment. Families in six sites in the United States were randomly assigned to one of 14 insurance plans for three- or five-year periods. On average, there were no significant adverse effects of cost-sharing plans, relative to a free-care plan, on either psychological well-being or psychological distress, when the cost-sharing plans included full catastrophic coverage. Those with high mental health status but low income at baseline had significantly more favorable mental health outcomes on the cost-sharing plans than on the free-care plan. We cannot definitively comment on the effects of insurance generosity for the sick poor. Our findings apply in the context of mandated comprehensive mental and general health coverage for a general nonelderly, nondisabled household population.



Author Affiliations

From The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif (Drs Wells, Manning, and Valdez); the Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute, and UCLA School of Medicine (Dr Wells); and the Division of Health Services, UCLA School of Public Health (Dr Valdez).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 29, 1988.

Reprint requests to The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA 90406 (Dr Wells).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Use, Quality, and Outcomes of Care for Mental Health: The Rural Perspective
Rost et al.
Med Care Res Rev 2002;59:231-265.
ABSTRACT  

The Course of Depression in Adult Outpatients: Results From the Medical Outcomes Study
Wells et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1992;49:788-794.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.