You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 46 No. 4, April 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Psychiatric Diagnosis in an Outpatient Population

A Comparative Study of PSE-Catego and DSM-III

Wim van den Brink, MD; Maarten W. J. Koeter, MA; Johan Ormel, PhD; Wim Dijkstra; Robert Giel, MD; Cees J. Slooff, MD; Tamar D. Wohlfarth, MA

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989;46(4):369-372.


Abstract

• Two diagnostic systems are compared in a psychiatric outpatient population of 175 patients. The Present State Examination (PSE)—Catego system identified 121 patients (69%) as "cases," whereas DSM-III identified 152 patients (87%) as cases. The two systems converged in 115 patients, yielding a K coefficient of only.32. Approximately one third of the DSM-III cases that were not detected by the PSE-Catego system was due to the restricted coverage of the latter system; the remaining two thirds could be attributed to differences in threshold and time framing. Compared with DSM-III, the PSE-Catego system showed a strong bias toward depression, and the system was extremely insensitive to the detection of social phobias and obsessive-compulsive disorders. Only 58% of cases of depression and 46% of cases of anxiety were diagnosed by both systems. The results are compared with other studies, and some consequences are discussed.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Psychiatry, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen (the Netherlands) (Drs van den Brink, Ormel, Giel, and Slooff and Messrs Koeter and Dijkstra), and the Department of Social Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York (Ms Wohlfarth).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Jan 27, 1988.

Reprint requests to Department of Social Psychiatry, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Oostersingel 59, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands (Dr van den Brink).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Core Mental State in Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Trikas et al.
Psychosom. Med. 1999;61:781-788.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Interview Skills and Identification of Emotional Disorders in Primary Care
Girón et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 1998;155:530-535.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.