You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 53 No. 10, October 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  NEWS AND VIEWS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Peering Into the 'Black Box'

Measuring Outcomes of Managed Care

Harold Alan Pincus, MD; Deborah A. Zarin, MD; Joyce C. West, MPP
From the Office of Research, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC.

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996;53(10):870-877.


Abstract

Research on the impact of managed care on access, quality, outcomes, and costs of mental health and substance abuse services has been limited because of the lack of generalizability of studies, the "black box" focus of much of the research, the dynamic changes in mental health and substance abuse managed care, and the proprietary nature of the health care industry. This article provides a framework for understanding the organizational, financial, and procedural features of health plans and the effect of these features on the characteristics and flow of patients through health plans and the selection and utilization of treatments. The diverse research priorities of key stakeholders, ie, public and private purchasers, managed care organizations, providers, and patients and their families, are described along with a broader societal agenda for delineating the outcomes of health care plans. Critical research and methodologic issues in studying the effects of managed care are outlined, including issues related to identifying and selecting appropriate outcome measures and developing appropriate methods for risk adjustment to adequately control for patient selection bias. This article asserts that government, purchasers, health care plans, providers, consumers, and researchers must collaboratively develop resources and research approaches to fully evaluate the effects of managed care. To realize this objective, auspices with reasonable objectivity are needed along with access to necessary data within the black box of health care systems, a cadre of trained investigators, and sufficient research funding, including the development of an all payers fund to support clinical and health services research.




Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Patient-Oriented Clinician-Researcher: Advantages and Challenges of Being a Double Agent
Yanos and Ziedonis
Psychiatr. Serv. 2006;57:249-253.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Case Study: A Medicaid Health Maintenance Organization Quality Initiative for Behavioral Health
Chang and Wilcox
American Journal of Medical Quality 2005;20:98-103.
ABSTRACT  

Association of Utilization Management and Treatment Plan Modifications Among Practicing U.S. Psychiatrists
Mintz et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2004;161:1103-1109.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of Claims Data to Examine the Impact of Length of Inpatient Psychiatric Stay on Readmission Rate
Figueroa et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 2004;55:560-565.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Large Medical Databases, Population-Based Research, and Patient Confidentiality
Simon et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2000;157:1731-1737.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Referrals to Psychiatrists: Assessing the Communication Interface Between Psychiatry and Primary Care
Tanielian et al.
Psychosomatics 2000;41:245-252.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparing Quality of Mental Health Care for Public-Sector and Privately Insured Populations
Leslie and Rosenheck
Psychiatr. Serv. 2000;51:650-655.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Shifting to Outpatient Care? Mental Health Care Use and Cost Under Private Insurance
Leslie and Rosenheck
Am. J. Psychiatry 1999;156:1250-1257.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Psychiatric Patients and Treatments in 1997: Findings From the American Psychiatric Practice Research Network
Pincus et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1999;56:441-449.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Characterizing Psychiatry With Findings From the 1996 National Survey of Psychiatric Practice
Zarin et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 1998;155:397-404.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Psychiatrist and Nonphysician Mental Health Provider Staffing Levels in Health Maintenance Organizations
Dial et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 1998;155:405-408.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prescribing Trends in Psychotropic Medications: Primary Care, Psychiatry, and Other Medical Specialties
Pincus et al.
JAMA 1998;279:526-531.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.