You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 54 No. 9, September 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Global Scale to Measure the Quality of the Family Environment

Joseph M. Rey, MD, FRANZCP; Michelle Singh, MPsychol(Clin); Se-fong Hung, FHKAM(Psychiatry), MRCPsych; David R. Dossetor, MD, MRCPsych; Louise Newman, MD, FRANZCP; Jon M. Plapp, PhD; Kevin D. Bird, PhD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1997;54(9):817-822.


Abstract

Background
Simple, reliable measures of the quality of the environment in which a child was reared that can be used in clinical research and practice are lacking.

Method
The reliability and validity of a global scale to retrospectively appraise the quality of that environment were examined. Fifty-three clinicians from 4 centers in Australia and 1 in Hong Kong, People's Republic of China, used the scale to rate 7 case vignettes; 4 clinicians rated 20 medical records, and 49 rated 211 subjects after clinical interviews.

Results
Interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) was 0.82 (time 1) and 0.84 (time 2) for case vignettes, 0.90 for medical records, and 0.89 for clinical interviews. Consistency in time was high (r=0.91). Lower ratings, indicative of a less adequate environment, were associated with a clinical diagnosis of oppositional defiant or conduct disorder.

Conclusions
Our simple-to-use scale appears to measure reliably a relevant clinical construct and fills a gap among the instruments available. Ratings may be useful as a cost-effective index to consider in outcome studies, when examining response to treatment, or in other clinical research.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Sydney (Drs Rey, Dossetor, and Plapp), Rivendell Child, Adolescent and Family Services (Drs Rey and Plapp), Wentworth Area Health Service, Child and Adolescent Mental Health Team (Ms Singh), the Department of Psychological Medicine, Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children (Dr Dossetor); Liverpool Pediatric Mental Health (Dr Newman), and the School of Psychology, University of New South Wales (Dr Bird), Sydney, New South Wales; and the Yaumatei Child Psychiatric Center, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China (Dr Hung).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Is it Trichotillomania? Hair Pulling in Childhood: A Developmental Perspective
Santhanam et al.
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 2008;13:409-418.
ABSTRACT  

Child Psychiatric Disorder: Measures, Causal Mechanisms, and Interventions
Rutter
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1997;54:785-789.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.