You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 57 No. 3, March 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (33)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Psychiatry, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Comparison of Diagnostic Interviews for Depression in the Stirling County Study

Challenges for Psychiatric Epidemiology

Jane M. Murphy, PhD; Richard R. Monson, MD, DSc; Nan M. Laird, PhD; Arthur M. Sobol, MA; Alexander H. Leighton, MD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57:230-236.

Background  High prevalence rates in psychiatric epidemiologic studies raise questions about whether data-gathering procedures identify transient responses rather than clinical disorders. This issue is explored relevant to depression using data from the Stirling County Study.

Methods  The study's customary method, the DPAX (DP for depression and AX for anxiety) was compared with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS), both of which were administered to a sample of 1396 subjects selected in 1992. Reasons for discordance were analyzed, and demographic correlates of responses to questions about dysphoria were examined. These lay-administered interviews were then compared with clinician-administered interviews that used the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID) with 139 subjects. The {kappa} statistic and logistic regression were used for statistical assessment.

Results  For the level of agreement between the DPAX and the DIS for current and lifetime depression, {kappa} = 0.40 and {kappa} = 0.33, respectively. Subjects diagnosed only by the DPAX tended to have less education than those diagnosed only by the DIS. Some idioms for dysphoria seemed to work better than others. Using SCID interviews as a clinical standard, the DPAX had 15% sensitivity and 96% specificity and the DIS had 25% sensitivity and 98% specificity.

Conclusions  Comprehension of an interview can be improved by using multiple questions for dysphoria and a simpler mode of inquiry. Clinician-administered interviews tend to corroborate disorders identified in lay-administered interviews but suggest that survey methods underestimate prevalence. Further research is needed to evaluate the validity of both types of interviews, but evidence from a 16-year follow-up evaluation indicates that depression diagnosed by the DPAX is a serious disorder in terms of morbidity and mortality.


From the Departments of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital (Dr Murphy and Mr Sobol); the Departments of Epidemiology (Drs Murphy and Monson) and Biostatistics (Dr Laird), Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass; and the Departments of Psychiatry and of Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia (Dr Leighton).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

A 40-Year Perspective on the Prevalence of Depression: The Stirling County Study
Jane M. Murphy, Nan M. Laird, Richard R. Monson, Arthur M. Sobol, and Alexander H. Leighton
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57(3):209-215.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Comparison of Self-report and Clinical Diagnostic Interviews for Depression: Diagnostic Interview Schedule and Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry in the Baltimore Epidemiologic Catchment Area Follow-up
William W. Eaton, Karen Neufeld, Li-Shiun Chen, and Guojun Cai
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57(3):217-222.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Community Diagnosis Counts
Darrel A. Regier
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57(3):223-224.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Controversies in Community-Based Psychiatric Epidemiology: Let the Data Speak for Themselves
Dan G. Blazer II and Berton H. Kaplan
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57(3):227-228.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Persistent Depression and Anxiety in the United States: Prevalence and Quality of Care
Young et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 2008;59:1391-1398.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Depression in Patients With Heart Failure: Prevalence, Pathophysiological Mechanisms, and Treatment
Thomas et al.
Crit Care Nurse 2008;28:40-55.
FULL TEXT  

Johns Hopkins Legionary: Leighton's Lineage and Legacy
Lumsden
Transcultural Psychiatry 2006;43:21-44.
ABSTRACT  

Major Depression and Associated Impairment: Same or Different Genetic and Environmental Risk Factors?
Foley et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2003;160:2128-2133.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A National Study of the Effect of Chronic Pain on the Use of Health Care by Depressed Persons
Bao et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 2003;54:693-697.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Regression Analysis of Multiple-Source Longitudinal Outcomes: A "Stirling County" Depression Study
Daskalakis et al.
Am J Epidemiol 2002;155:88-94.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Quality of Care for Depressive and Anxiety Disorders in the United States
Young et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001;58:55-61.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Community Diagnosis Counts
Regier
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2000;57:223-224.
FULL TEXT  

Controversies in Community-Based Psychiatric Epidemiology: Let the Data Speak for Themselves
Blazer II and Kaplan
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2000;57:227-228.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.