You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 58 No. 12, December 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (73)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Stress
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Emotional Reactivity to Daily Life Stress in Psychosis

Inez Myin-Germeys, PhD; Jim van Os, MD, PhD, MRCPsych; Joseph E. Schwartz, PhD; Arthur A. Stone, PhD; Philippe A. Delespaul, PhD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:1137-1144.

Background  The vulnerability-stress model of psychotic disorders describes, in essence, an interaction between personal vulnerability and environmental stressors. The present study investigated this interaction and studied emotional reactivity to daily life stress as a vulnerability marker for psychotic illness.

Methods  Patients with psychotic illness (n = 42), their first-degree relatives (n = 47), and control subjects (n = 49) were studied with the Experience Sampling Method (a structured diary technique assessing thoughts, current context, and mood in daily life) to assess (1) appraised subjective stress of daily events and smaller disturbances in daily life and (2) emotional reactivity conceptualized as changes in both negative affect and positive affect.

Results  Multilevel regression analyses showed that an increase in subjective stress was associated with an increase in negative affect and a decrease in positive affect in all groups. However, the groups differed quantitatively in their pattern of reactions to stress. Patients with psychotic illness reacted with more intense emotions to subjective appraisals of stress in daily life than control subjects. The decrease in positive affect in the relatives was similar to that of the patients, while the increase in negative affect in this group was intermediary to that of patients and control subjects.

Conclusions  Higher levels of familial risk for psychosis were associated with higher levels of emotional reactivity to daily life stress in a dose-response fashion. Subtle alterations in the way persons interact with their environment may constitute part of the vulnerability for psychotic illness.


From the Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, European Graduate School of Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands (Drs Myin-Germeys, van Os, and Delespaul); the Department of Psychiatry, State University of New York, Stony Brook, (Drs Schwartz and Stone); and the Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, London, England (Dr van Os).

Corresponding author: Jim van Os, MD, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, European Graduate School of Neuroscience, Maastricht University, PO Box 616 (PAR 45), 6200 MD Maastricht, the Netherlands.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Subjective Experience of Cognitive Failures as Possible Risk Factor for Negative Symptoms of Psychosis in the General Population
Pfeifer et al.
Schizophr Bull 2009;35:766-774.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Concurrent Measurement of "Real-World" Stress and Arousal in Individuals With Psychosis: Assessing the Feasibility and Validity of a Novel Methodology
Kimhy et al.
Schizophr Bull 2009;0:sbp028v1-sbp028.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Life Events and High-Trait Reactivity Together Predict Psychotic Symptom Increases in Schizophrenia
Docherty et al.
Schizophr Bull 2009;35:638-645.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Psychosocial Stress and Psychosis. A Review of the Neurobiological Mechanisms and the Evidence for Gene-Stress Interaction
van Winkel et al.
Schizophr Bull 2008;34:1095-1105.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Gene-Environment Interplay Between Cannabis and Psychosis
Henquet et al.
Schizophr Bull 2008;34:1111-1121.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Gene-Environment Interactions in Schizophrenia: Review of Epidemiological Findings and Future Directions
van Os et al.
Schizophr Bull 2008;34:1066-1082.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Emotional Response Deficits in Schizophrenia: Insights From Affective Science
Kring and Moran
Schizophr Bull 2008;34:819-834.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Studying and Treating Schizophrenia Using Virtual Reality: A New Paradigm
Freeman
Schizophr Bull 2008;34:605-610.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Emotional Experience in Patients With Schizophrenia Revisited: Meta-analysis of Laboratory Studies
Cohen and Minor
Schizophr Bull 2008;0:sbn061v1-sbn061.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Susceptibility to Depression Expressed as Alterations in Cortisol Day Curve: A Cross-Twin, Cross-Trait Study
Wichers et al.
Psychosom. Med. 2008;70:314-318.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does the Concept of "Sensitization" Provide a Plausible Mechanism for the Putative Link Between the Environment and Schizophrenia?
Collip et al.
Schizophr Bull 2008;34:220-225.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pituitary volume in psychosis: the first review of the evidence
Pariante
J Psychopharmacol 2008;22:76-81.
ABSTRACT  

Prediction of psychosis: setting the stage
YUNG and McGORRY
Br. J. Psychiatry 2007;191:s1-s8.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Genetic risk of depression and stress-induced negative affect in daily life
Wichers et al.
Br. J. Psychiatry 2007;191:218-223.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cognitive, Emotional, and Social Processes in Psychosis: Refining Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Persistent Positive Symptoms
Kuipers et al.
Schizophr Bull 2006;32:S24-S31.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Stress-Related Negative Affectivity and Genetically Altered Serotonin Transporter Function: Evidence of Synergism in Shaping Risk of Depression.
Jacobs et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2006;63:989-996.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Anhedonia in Schizophrenia: A Review of Assessment Strategies
Horan et al.
Schizophr Bull 2006;32:259-273.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Data Gathering: Biased in Psychosis?
Van Dael et al.
Schizophr Bull 2006;32:341-351.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Genes making one feel blue in the flow of daily life: a momentary assessment study of gene-stress interaction.
Jacobs et al.
Psychosom. Med. 2006;68:201-206.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Time for a shift in focus in schizophrenia: from narrow phenotypes to broad endophenotypes
Weiser et al.
Br. J. Psychiatry 2005;187:203-205.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pituitary volume in psychosis
Pariante et al.
Br. J. Psychiatry 2004;185:5-10.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Can the social environment cause schizophrenia?
van Os and McGuffin
Br. J. Psychiatry 2003;182:291-292.
FULL TEXT  

Factors Related to Psychiatric Hospital Readmission Among Children and Adolescents in State Custody
Romansky et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 2003;54:356-362.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Are Cognitive Impairments Associated With Sensitivity to Stress in Schizophrenia? An Experience Sampling Study
Myin-Germeys et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2002;159:443-449.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.