This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (26)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Stress  • Alert me on articles by topic

An Evaluation of the Stress-Diathesis Model

Kenneth S. Kendler, MD; John Myers, MS; Carol A. Prescott, PhD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002;59:242-248.

Background  We evaluated for phobias the prediction of the stress-diathesis model that the magnitude of stress at onset is inversely proportional to the level of underlying diathesis.

Methods  In more than 7500 twins from a population-based registry, we assessed the personality trait of neuroticism—as an index of phobia-proneness—and the lifetime histories of 5 phobia subtypes (agoraphobia, social, animal, situational, and blood or injury) and their associated irrational fears. Interviewers classified the mode of acquisition of the fear in phobic twins into 5 possible categories: trauma to self (further divided by severity), observed trauma to others, observed fear in others, taught by others to be afraid, and no memory of how or why fear developed. Analyses were conducted by logistic regression and analysis of covariance.

Results  The mode of acquisition had moderate test-retest reliability and differed meaningfully across phobia subtypes. None of the 3 tests of the stress-diathesis model was confirmatory: (1) the risk of phobias was not elevated in co-twins of twins who had no memory of their mode of acquisition, (2) the risk of phobias was not decreased in co-twins of twins who had severe trauma to self, and (3) no significant relationship, in phobic twins, was found between levels of neuroticism and mode of acquisition.

Conclusions  These results are inconsistent with the traditional etiologic theories for phobias, which assume conditioning or social transmission. However, they are compatible with nonassociative models, which postulate that the vulnerability to phobias is largely innate and does not arise directly from environmental experiences. The stress-diathesis model may not be an appropriate paradigm for phobic disorders.

From the Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics (Drs Kendler and Prescott and Mr Myers) and the Departments of Psychiatry (Drs Kendler and Prescott and Mr Myers) and Human Genetics (Dr Kendler), Medical College of Virginia of Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Longitudinal Twin Study of Fears From Middle Childhood to Early Adulthood: Evidence for a Developmentally Dynamic Genome
Kendler et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2008;65:421-429.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Increased Amygdala and Insula Activation During Emotion Processing in Anxiety-Prone Subjects
Stein et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2007;164:318-327.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Anterior insula reactivity during certain decisions is associated with neuroticism
Feinstein et al.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2006;1:136-142.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Personality and comorbidity of common psychiatric disorders
Khan et al.
Br. J. Psychiatry 2005;186:190-196.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Traumatic Process: Conceptualization and Treatment
Noy
Traumatology 2004;10:211-230.
ABSTRACT  

Genetic and Environmental Influences on Trauma Exposure and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms: A Twin Study
Stein et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2002;159:1675-1681.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT