You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 59 No. 4, April 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (11)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Psychiatry, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Cost and Cost-effectiveness of Hospital vs Residential Crisis Care for Patients Who Have Serious Mental Illness

Wayne S. Fenton, MD; Jeffrey S. Hoch, PhD; James M. Herrell, PhD, MPH; Loren Mosher, MD; Lisa Dixon, MD, MPH

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002;59:357-364.

Background  This study evaluates the cost and cost-effectiveness of a residential crisis program compared with treatment received in a general hospital psychiatric unit for patients who have serious mental illness in need of hospital-level care and who are willing to accept voluntary treatment.

Methods  Patients in the Montgomery County, Maryland, public mental health system (N = 119) willing to accept voluntary acute care were randomized to the psychiatric ward of a general hospital or a residential crisis program. Unit costs and service utilization data were used to estimate episode and 6-month treatment costs from the perspective of government payors. Episodic symptom reduction and days residing in the community over the 6 months after the episode were chosen to represent effectiveness.

Results  Mean (SD) acute treatment episode costs was $3046 ($2124) in the residential crisis program, 44% lower than the $5549 ($3668) episode cost for the general hospital. Total 6-month treatment costs for patients assigned to the 2 programs were $19 941 ($19 282) and $25 737 ($21 835), respectively. Treatment groups did not differ significantly in symptom improvement or community days achieved. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios indicate that in most cases, the residential crisis program provides near-equivalent effectiveness for significantly less cost.

Conclusions  Residential crisis programs may be a cost-effective approach to providing acute care to patients who have serious mental illness and who are willing to accept voluntary treatment. Where resources are scarce, access to needed acute care might be extended using a mix of hospital, community-based residential crisis, and community support services.


From the National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Md (Dr Fenton); Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and the Department of Family Medicine University of Western Ontario School of Medicine and Dentistry, London (Dr Hoch); Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Division of Practice and Systems Development, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Rockville, Md (Dr Herrell); Soteria Associates, San Diego, Calif (Dr Mosher); and the University of Maryland, Baltimore (Dr Dixon).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Evaluating the effectiveness of a women's crisis house: a prospective observational study
Meiser-Stedman et al.
Psychiatr. Bull. 2006;30:324-326.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Randomized Trial of Short-Term Acute Residential Treatment for Veterans
Hawthorne et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 2005;56:1379-1386.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

An Economic Evaluation of Inpatient Residential Treatment Programs in the Department of Veterans Affairs
Wagner and Chen
Med Care Res Rev 2005;62:187-204.
ABSTRACT  

Cost-Effectiveness of Two Vocational Rehabilitation Programs for Persons With Severe Mental Illness
Dixon et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 2002;53:1118-1124.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.