You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 59 No. 9, September 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (36)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Psychiatry, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Autonomic Response in Depersonalization Disorder

Mauricio Sierra, MD, PhD; Carl Senior, PhD; Jeffrey Dalton, MSc; Michael McDonough, MD; Alison Bond, MD; Mary L. Phillips, MD; Anne M. O'Dwyer, MD; Anthony S. David, MD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002;59:833-838.

Background  Emotional-processing inhibition has been suggested as a mechanism underlying some of the clinical features of depersonalization and/or derealization. In this study, we tested the prediction that autonomic response to emotional stimuli would be reduced in patients with depersonalization disorder.

Methods  The skin conductance responses of 15 patients with chronic depersonalization disorder according to DSM-IV, 15 controls, and 11 individuals with anxiety disorders according to DSM-IV, were recorded in response to nonspecific elicitors (an unexpected clap and taking a sigh) and in response to 15 randomized pictures with different emotional valences: 5 unpleasant, 5 pleasant, and 5 neutral.

Results  The skin conductance response to unpleasant pictures was significantly reduced in patients with depersonalization disorder (magnitude of 0.017 µsiemens in controls and 0.103 µsiemens in patients with anxiety disorders; P = .01). Also, the latency of response to these stimuli was significantly prolonged in the group with depersonalization disorder (3.01 seconds compared with 2.5 and 2.1 seconds in the control and anxiety groups, respectively; P = .02). In contrast, latency to nonspecific stimuli (clap and sigh) was significantly shorter in the depersonalization and anxiety groups (1.6 seconds) than in controls (2.3 seconds) (P = .03).

Conclusions  In depersonalization disorder, autonomic response to unpleasant stimuli is reduced. The fact that patients with depersonalization disorder respond earlier to a startling noise suggests that they are in a heightened state of alertness and that the reduced response to unpleasant stimuli is caused by a selective inhibitory mechanism on emotional processing.


From the Institue of Psychiatry, King's College, London University, London, England. Dr Senior is now with the National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Md.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Cerebral and autonomic responses to emotional facial expressions in depersonalisation disorder
Lemche et al.
Br. J. Psychiatry 2008;193:222-228.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Understanding and treating depersonalisation disorder
Medford et al.
Adv. Psychiatr. Treat. 2005;11:92-100.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Depersonalisation disorder: clinical features of 204 cases
BAKER et al.
Br. J. Psychiatry 2003;182:428-433.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.