 |
|
Challenges in Operationalizing the DSM-IV Clinical Significance Criterion
Janette Beals, PhD;
Douglas K. Novins, MD;
Paul Spicer, PhD;
Heather D. Orton, MS;
Christina M. Mitchell, PhD;
Anna E. Barón, PhD;
Spero M. Manson, PhD;
and the AI-SUPERPFP Team
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004;61:1197-1207.
Background An explicit clinical significance (CS) criterion was added to many DSM-IV diagnoses in an attempt to more closely approximate the clinical diagnostic process and reduce the proportion of false positives in epidemiological studies. The American Indian Service Utilization, Psychiatric Epidemiology, Risk and Protective Factors Project (AI-SUPERPFP) offered a unique opportunity to examine the success of this effort.
Objective To determine the impact of distress, impairment, and help-seeking reported in a lay structured interview on concordance with a clinical reappraisal. Further, to test the efficacy of 5 operationalizations of CS on the concordance and prevalence of DSM-IV lifetime disorders.
Design Completed between 1997 and 2000, a cross-sectional probability sample survey with clinical reappraisal of approximately 10% of participants.
Setting General community.
Participants A population-based sample of 3084 members of 2 American Indian tribal groups, who were between the ages of 15 and 54 years and resided on or near their home reservations, were randomly sampled from the tribal rolls and participated in structured psychiatric interviews. Clinical reappraisals were conducted with approximately 10% of the lay-interview participants. The response rate for the lay interview was 75%, and for the clinical reappraisal it was 72%.
Main Outcomes Measures The AI-SUPERPFP Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), a culturally adapted version of the CIDI, University of Michigan version. Adapted to assess DSM-IV diagnoses, questions assessing the CS criterion were inserted in all diagnostic modules. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID) was used in the clinical reappraisal.
Results Most participants who qualified as having AI-SUPERPFP CIDI lifetime disorders reported at least moderate levels of distress or impairment. Evidence of increased concordance between the CIDI and the SCID was lacking when more restrictive operationalizations of CS were used; indeed, the CIDI was very likely to underdiagnose disorders compared with the SCID (false negatives). Concomitantly, the CS operationalizations affected prevalence rates dramatically.
Conclusion The CS criterion, at least as operationalized to date, demonstrates little effectiveness in increasing the validity of diagnoses using lay-administered structured interviews.
Author Affiliations: American Indian and Alaska Native Programs (Drs Beals, Novins, Spicer, Mitchell, and Manson, Ms Orton, and the AI-SUPERPFP Team) and Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics (Dr Barón), University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Aurora. The names of the AI-SUPERPFP team authors are listed at the end of this article.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Mental Health Disparities
Safran et al.
AJPH 2009;99:1962-1966.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
An Economic Evaluation of Telehealth Data Collection With Rural Populations
Shore et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 2007;58:830-835.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Diagnostic Reliability of Telepsychiatry in American Indian Veterans
Shore et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2007;164:115-118.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Health Disparities in Care for Depression Possibly Obscured by the Clinical Significance Criterion
Coyne and Marcus
Am. J. Psychiatry 2006;163:1577-1579.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Epidemiology of Major Depressive Disorder: Results From the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcoholism and Related Conditions
Hasin et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005;62:1097-1106.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Prevalence of DSM-IV Disorders and Attendant Help-Seeking in 2 American Indian Reservation Populations
Beals et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005;62:99-108.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|
