You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 62 No. 10, October 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on ISI (19)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Disentangling Deficits in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Evelijne M. Bekker, PhD; Carin C.E. Overtoom, PhD; J.J. Sandra Kooij, MD; Jan K. Buitelaar, PhD, MD; Marinus N. Verbaten, PhD; J. Leon Kenemans, PhD

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:1129-1136.

Context  A lack of inhibitory control has been suggested to be the core deficit in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), especially in adults. This means that a primary deficit in inhibition mediates a cascade of secondary deficits in other executive functions, such as attention. Impaired stopping has been claimed to support the inhibition hypothesis. However, executive functions such as inhibition and attention are hard to disentangle.

Objective  To use event-related potentials in adult patients with ADHD to show that impaired stopping is associated with abnormalities of attention.

Design  The stop signal task was presented to 24 adults with ADHD combined subtype and 24 controls. Stop event-related potentials are distorted by overlap from event-related potentials to other stimuli in close temporal proximity, but we applied a method (Adjar level 2) to effectively remove this overlap.

Results  In line with an inhibitory control deficit, the stop signal reaction time was longer in adults with ADHD (F1,46 = 7.12, P<.01) whereas there was no significant difference for go stimulus reaction time. Overlap-free stop event-related potentials revealed smaller stop P3s in adults with ADHD (F1,44 = 4.20, P<.05). In children with ADHD, this has been interpreted to reflect deficient inhibitory control. However, controls were also found to have larger early responses in the auditory cortex (N1) when stop signals resulted in successful stops, relative to failed stops, signifying increased attention (F1,23 = 11.88, P<.01). This difference was completely absent in adults with ADHD.

Conclusions  Disturbed attentional processing of the stop signal contributed to impaired stopping in adults with ADHD. This finding may have implications for treatment.


Author Affiliations: Department of Psychopharmacology (Drs Bekker, Overtoom, Verbaten, and Kenemans), Department of Psychonomics (Dr Kenemans), Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Developmental Psychology, Experimental Psychology Graduate School, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (Dr Overtoom); Parnassia Psycho-Medical Center, the Hague, the Netherlands (Dr Kooij); and Department of Psychiatry and Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Center, St Radboud, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (Dr Buitelaar).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.