You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 62 No. 11, November 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (11)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Adolescent Psychiatry
 •Depression
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Cost-effectiveness of an Intervention to Prevent Depression in At-Risk Teens

Frances L. Lynch, PhD, MSPH; Mark Hornbrook, PhD; Gregory N. Clarke, PhD; Nancy Perrin, PhD; Michael R. Polen, PhD; Elizabeth O’Connor, PhD; John Dickerson, MS

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:1241-1248.

Contact  Depression is common in adolescent offspring of depressed parents and can be prevented, but adoption of prevention programs is dependent on the balance of their incremental costs and benefits.

Objective  To examine the incremental cost-effectiveness of a group cognitive behavioral intervention to prevent depression in adolescent offspring of depressed parents.

Design  Cost-effectiveness analysis of a recent randomized controlled trial.

Setting  Kaiser Permanente Northwest, a large health maintenance organization.

Participants  Teens 13 to 18 years old at risk for depression.

Interventions  Usual care (n = 49) or usual care plus a 15-session group cognitive therapy prevention program (n = 45).

Main Outcome Measures  Clinical outcomes were converted to depression-free days and quality-adjusted life-years. Total health maintenance organization costs, costs of services received in other sectors, and family costs were combined with clinical outcomes in a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the intervention with usual care for 1 year after the intervention.

Results  Average cost of the intervention was $1632, and total direct and indirect costs increased by $610 in the intervention group. However, the result was not statistically significant, suggesting a possible cost offset. Estimated incremental cost per depression-free day in the base-case analysis was $10 (95% confidence interval, –$13 to $52) or $9275 per quality-adjusted life-year (95% confidence interval, –$12 148 to $45 641).

Conclusions  Societal cost-effectiveness of a brief prevention program to reduce the risk of depression in offspring of depressed parents is comparable to that of accepted depression treatments, and the program is cost-effective compared with other health interventions commonly covered in insurance contracts.


Author Affiliations: Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Ore (Drs Lynch, Hornbrook, Clarke, Polen, and O’Connor and Mr Dickerson); and School of Nursing, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (Dr Perrin).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Effectiveness of Problem-Solving Therapy for Older, Primary Care Patients With Depression: Results From the IMPACT Project
Arean et al.
Gerontologist 2008;48:311-323.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-Effectiveness of Treatments for Adolescent Depression: Results From TADS
Domino et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 2008;165:588-596.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

It Pays to Prevent Depression in High-Risk Teens
JWatch Psychiatry 2005;2005:4-4.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.