• Online Features  This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (78)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Primary Care/ Family Medicine  • Psychiatry  • Depression  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Wayne J. Katon, MD; Michael Schoenbaum, PhD; Ming-Yu Fan, PhD; Christopher M. Callahan, MD; John Williams, Jr, MD, MHS; Enid Hunkeler, MA; Linda Harpole, MD, MPH; Xiao-Hua Andrew Zhou, PhD; Christopher Langston, PhD; Jürgen Unützer, MD, MPH; for the IMPACT Investigators

Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:1313-1320.

Context  Depression is a leading cause of functional impairment in elderly individuals and is associated with high medical costs, but there are large gaps in quality of treatment in primary care.

Objective  To determine the incremental cost-effectiveness of the Improving Mood Promoting Access to Collaborative Treatment (IMPACT) collaborative care management program for late-life depression.

Design  Randomized controlled trial with recruitment from July 1999 to August 2001.

Setting  Eighteen primary care clinics from 8 health care organizations in 5 states.

Participants  A total of 1801 patients 60 years or older with major depression (17%), dysthymic disorder (30%), or both (53%).

Intervention  Patients were randomly assigned to the IMPACT intervention (n = 906) or to usual primary care (n = 895). Intervention patients were provided access to a depression care manager supervised by a psychiatrist and primary care physician. Depression care managers offered education, support of antidepressant medications prescribed in primary care, and problem-solving treatment in primary care (a brief psychotherapy).

Main Outcome Measures  Total outpatient costs, depression-free days, and quality-adjusted life-years.

Results  Relative to usual care, intervention patients experienced 107 (95% confidence interval [CI], 86 to 128) more depression-free days over 24 months. Total outpatient costs were $295 (95% CI, –$525 to $1115) higher during this period. The incremental outpatient cost per depression-free day was $2.76 (95% CI, –$4.95 to $10.47) and incremental outpatient costs per quality-adjusted life-year ranged from $2519 (95% CI, –$4517 to $9554) to $5037 (95% CI, –$9034 to $19 108). Results of a bootstrap analysis suggested a 25% probability that the IMPACT intervention was "dominant" (ie, lower costs and greater effectiveness).

Conclusions  The IMPACT intervention is a high-value investment for older adults; it is associated with high clinical benefits at a low increment in health care costs.

Author Affiliations: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.

CiteULike    Connotea    Delicious    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Increased Anxiety and Length of Treatment Associated With Depressed Patients Who are Readmitted to Collaborative Care
Angstman et al.
Journal of Primary Care & Community Health 2011;2:82-86.
ABSTRACT  

Effectiveness of Collaborative Care for Depression in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Clinics
Pyne et al.
Arch Intern Med 2011;171:23-31.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of a Rural Telemedicine Collaborative Care Intervention for Depression
Pyne et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2010;67:812-821.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Collaborative Care Management for Depression: Comparison of Cost Metrics and Clinical Response to Usual Care
Angstman et al.
Journal of Primary Care & Community Health 2010;1:73-77.
ABSTRACT  

Review: The Net Benefits of Depression Management in Primary Care
Glied et al.
Med Care Res Rev 2010;67:251-274.
ABSTRACT  

Interdisciplinary Stepped Care for Depression After Acute Coronary Syndrome
Whooley and Unutzer
Arch Intern Med 2010;170:585-586.
FULL TEXT  

Patients in a Depression Collaborative Care Model of Care: Comparison of 6-Month Cost Utilization Data With Usual Care
Angstman and Williams
Journal of Primary Care & Community Health 2010;1:12-16.
ABSTRACT  

Incremental Benefit and Cost of Telephone Care Management and Telephone Psychotherapy for Depression in Primary Care
Simon et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2009;66:1081-1089.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

To Screen or Not to Screen?: Depression in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease
Whooley
J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:891-893.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Chronology of Distress, Anxiety, and Depression in Older Prostate Cancer Patients
Nelson et al.
The Oncologist 2009;14:891-899.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Promoting Mental Health Recovery After Hurricanes Katrina and Rita: What Can Be Done at What Cost
Schoenbaum et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2009;66:906-914.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Optimized Antidepressant Therapy and Pain Self-management in Primary Care Patients With Depression and Musculoskeletal Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Kroenke et al.
JAMA 2009;301:2099-2110.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Stepped-Care Prevention of Anxiety and Depression in Late Life: A Randomized Controlled Trial
van't Veer-Tazelaar et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2009;66:297-304.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long-Term Effects on Medical Costs of Improving Depression Outcomes in Patients With Depression and Diabetes
Katon et al.
Diabetes Care 2008;31:1155-1159.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Depression in Elderly Diabetes Patients
Trief
Diabetes Spectr. 2007;20:71-75.
FULL TEXT  

Cost-effectiveness of Systematic Depression Treatment Among People With Diabetes Mellitus
Simon et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007;64:65-72.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving care for depression: there's no free lunch.
Rubenstein
ANN INTERN MED 2006;145:544-546.
FULL TEXT  

Cost-Effectiveness and Net Benefit of Enhanced Treatment of Depression for Older Adults With Diabetes and Depression
Katon et al.
Diabetes Care 2006;29:265-270.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT